- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
The only threat from Russia is a mirror response to the threat from NATO. It’s good that professional soldiers understand the role they are expected to play and are opting out.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
This week, French Armed Forces Minister Sébastien Lecornu presented a talent retention plan to incentivize military personnel to remain in uniform.
For countries relying on professional armies, the challenge is to make the armed forces attractive — something that’s difficult to do in times of low unemployment, fierce competition from the private sector and widespread use of remote working.
But the problem is that the terms of service just aren’t that attractive, with chronic overtime, months-long absences from home and missed recuperation periods commonplace.
“The issue is not recruiting but retention, we need to retain also families,” Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the U.S. Navy’s chief of naval operations, said at a conference in Paris earlier this year.
In Germany, as part of efforts to beef up national defense, the government wants to get its armed forces headcount to 203,000 by the early 2030s — but recruitment is only growing slowly.
The Bundestag’s special commissioner for the armed forces, Eva Högl, has said that reinstating some form of conscription is one way to turn things around, but targeting women is a more obvious move to arrest the decline since potential there is “far from exhausted,” the lawmaker wrote.
The original article contains 649 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 70%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!