• teft@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Gotta love how it’s review bombing and couldn’t possibly be legitimate reviews by people who dislike microtransactions and the recent trend of companies hiding shit like this until the very last second.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      I call it review awareness with real people who aren’t scared of being blacklisted highlighting and informing normal people of aspects of the game paid reviewers ignore and don’t bother to go back and update their score out of fear.

    • lemmy_get_my_coat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Could it just be that review bombing as a term has come to mean people mobilising to negatively review a game and not necessarily being linked to it being a scummy practice? I’m not very familiar with too many instances of it happening, but can accept that in reading this review that the author does seem to agree with people doling out the negative reviews for the bait and switch on microtransactions.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah. Between putting basic game feature additional charges (you can still get them, but with money you get it faster) behind a paywall and the shit-tastic performance issues, I definitely expected it to get terrible reviews.

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      So you think the ratings people are giving it reflect a balanced consideration of all the game’s aspects including story, gameplay, graphics, art direction, sound design, and the existence of microtransactions for things trivially earnable in normal gameplay?

      I’m all for people sending a giant middle finger to publishers putting in unnecessary cash grabs into games by hitting them where it hurts in reviews (which do impact lifetime sales numbers).

      But let’s not try to call this anything but what it is. Giving zero score reviews for something you don’t like existing in the game (whether gender options to microtransactions) irrespective of the quality of the game outside of those things existing is literally “review bombing.”

      It’s ok to be that, and it serves an important protest function in the industry, but let’s call a spade a spade here.

      • MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Think of it this way -

        If you have a marvelous feast laid out across the entire table, made of all your favorite foods, and right next to plate of pie is a bowl of cow shit - it doesn’t matter how good the pie is, you’re still going to smell the shit and it will ruin the experience.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The fact that there are microtransactions changes me from buying it to not buying it. Clearly a lot of people feel the same.

        But yes, the addition of monetization I’m not OK with absolutely can turn a 10/10 game to a 0/10 game. Quality isn’t an average. It’s the end product. A single flaw can very easily make a masterpiece into a pile of shit.

        It’s not possible for something that affects gameplay changing your review to be a review bomb under any circumstances.

  • A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Such a disappointment. I was starting to look forward to grabbing it on PS5 but I’ll probably pass. I missed the boat on the first one anyway.

    • Thrife@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      You can still play the first one, dark arisen is also currently in the second tier of PS+ and worth to at least look at :)

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s excellent and the microtransactions are literally pointless cash grabs added in after development.

      I’m about 20 hours in, having an absolute blast with probably my most enjoyed RPG in years, and I literally have too many of every item in the cash store except one that I know I’ll eventually have quite enough of too, especially on what’s a certain NG+ for me.

      The game itself is outstanding. The protest against CAPCOM throwing BS into single player games is warranted, but if you like action RPGs don’t accidentally cut off your nose in spite by passing on a gem of a game with a greedy publisher.

      There’s literally not anything in the store you should buy and doing so will reduce your enjoyment of the game rather than enhance it. It’s the opposite of Ubisoft where gameplay pacing is designed with things like XP boosts in mind.

      The store is simply there to trick whales and suckers as an afterthought, and those who do purchase certain items will harm their gameplay loops.

      • 3aqn5k6ryk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        it doesnt matter if the microtransaction is a cash grab. Its a waste of time puting it in a game. Might as well spend all that time optimizing the game.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I was hoping they would have adapted the qol improvements from ddon but I never imagined they would have brought over the microtransactions