No matter who attacks first in any given case, the Israeli government is committing genocide on a people already put in an open air prison, killing at least double (by their own likely low estimate) the number of civilians, mostly children, as Hamas terrorists.
And that’s not even counting the deaths they’re causing via keeping food, water, medication and medical treatment from the people.
This isn’t Israel Vs Hamas. It’s the Israeli government perpetrating a laundry list of human rights violations on the people of Gaza using Hamas as a completely disingenuous pretext.
In the future just say something along these lines so that people aren’t getting the mistaken impression you are pro-hamas
No. It’s not reasonable to demand that every criticism of the genocide mentions Hamas. Just like you’d never agree to add “and the IDF are awful too” every time you condemn Hamas.
No reasonable person automatically infers “I like Hamas” from any criticism of the genocidal actions of the Israeli government.
Sadly, there are quite a few people on this site that description applies to
Without a doubt fewer than you think/pretend to think.
believe me
Like with Trump, a Zionist saying that is usually indicative of a lie or, at best, a distortion of the truth is coming or directly preceded those words.
do not want to get mixed up for being one of those guys
Luckily, nobody arguing in good faith has ever made that mistake since I’ve never said anything positive about the terrorist group Hamas.
Good. Could you stop being a defeatist and counterfactual doomer, then?
This is a big issue with people who have just joined the movement
I’ve been Pro-Palestine since I first learned about the conflict in the mid-90s. Pro-BSD since I first heard about BSD a couple decades ago. I’d hardly call that “just joined”.
accusing everybody we don’t like of being a Zionist hurts more Palestinian people than it helps.
That part is true. Dismissing something that would be a complete game changer by claiming that it would make zero difference hurts the cause as well, though. Some would argue much more.
Take the criticism and do better
Right back at you, doomer.
stop being a narcissist.
Where the fuck did THAT come from??
Vehemently disagreeing with your incorrect take does not equal anything even remotely approaching something that could be mistaken for narcissism in good faith.
Removed by mod
No matter who attacks first in any given case, the Israeli government is committing genocide on a people already put in an open air prison, killing at least double (by their own likely low estimate) the number of civilians, mostly children, as Hamas terrorists.
And that’s not even counting the deaths they’re causing via keeping food, water, medication and medical treatment from the people.
This isn’t Israel Vs Hamas. It’s the Israeli government perpetrating a laundry list of human rights violations on the people of Gaza using Hamas as a completely disingenuous pretext.
Removed by mod
Nope. I am categorically against terrorism under any and all circumstances.
You can condemn the actions of both Hamas and the Israeli government. In fact, it’s morally and ethically reprehensible not to.
Removed by mod
No. It’s not reasonable to demand that every criticism of the genocide mentions Hamas. Just like you’d never agree to add “and the IDF are awful too” every time you condemn Hamas.
No reasonable person automatically infers “I like Hamas” from any criticism of the genocidal actions of the Israeli government.
Without a doubt fewer than you think/pretend to think.
Like with Trump, a Zionist saying that is usually indicative of a lie or, at best, a distortion of the truth is coming or directly preceded those words.
Luckily, nobody arguing in good faith has ever made that mistake since I’ve never said anything positive about the terrorist group Hamas.
Removed by mod
Good. Could you stop being a defeatist and counterfactual doomer, then?
I’ve been Pro-Palestine since I first learned about the conflict in the mid-90s. Pro-BSD since I first heard about BSD a couple decades ago. I’d hardly call that “just joined”.
That part is true. Dismissing something that would be a complete game changer by claiming that it would make zero difference hurts the cause as well, though. Some would argue much more.
Right back at you, doomer.
Where the fuck did THAT come from??
Vehemently disagreeing with your incorrect take does not equal anything even remotely approaching something that could be mistaken for narcissism in good faith.
Could have fooled me with your doomer nonsense.
Removed by mod