• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    We can’t split up, all too interdependent. For example, I see people on here telling the red states to fuck off to themselves. Good luck eating food.

    How about military presence? Trying to split down on that is a hard stop, not even thinkable. The federal government ain’t going to allow it, no matter what.

    Any Southerners wanting to try again are getting stomped far faster than last time. Even then, you got armed libs like me embedded in the countryside. And yes, it’s worth my life to shoot “red shirts”. (And that’s easy for me to say. I’m older and understood my history classes.)

      • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good luck growing anything after succeeding. It would severely limit California’s access to the Colorado river and considering California is already in a water crisis being self sustainable wouldn’t last very long

        • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Eh I doubt Colorado would block water rights to CA. AZ and UT are kind of the wild cats. I would expect them all to just let it keep flowing because someone up stream of them could do the same. It’s kind of like having nukes and having alliances.

          But is the same sort of thoughts when I lived in the Great Lakes area. It was thought to be a good area for dirty bombs and to pollute the hell out of it because it feeds the rest of the country’s water.

          Was always told The Perry nuclear power plant was a target because of that

      • Stupidmanager@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yep. Though until California can pull pure water from salt water, Utah will stop water from coming in. Though in Colorado, we’ll just block it off before it gets there as we battle out our own red vs blue. Fuckem.

      • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Seceding from the union is illegal. They would just arrest the organizers in the state government and replace them with acceptable politicians to bring them back in line.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Seceding from the union is illegal, unless we all agree that this is going to happen.

          But there’s plenty of other geographical issues with this idea. It’s hard to draw lines around liberal cities and conservative rural areas.

          • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, it stopped the United States from breaking up before. What better case study than the exact same scenario. Just this time its a much much stronger union army against a much much poorer economic system for the seceding army.

            Other countries would not supply the secessionists with any military equipment and they almost certainly wouldn’t purchase any products from them either. International sanctions against the seceding states would end the “war” before it even began.

              • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                I recognize that, but even if they were to still somehow navigate the economic situation, the government officials would immediately be charged with sedition and a warrant would be issued for their arrest. They wouldn’t be able to flee the country because any allied country would extradite them to the formal United States government. So the only other option would be to stay and forcefully defend their arrest. That brings in the national guard and any escalation would drive us toward a true civil war. MAYBE secession becomes so popular amongst the population that they also are willing to defend their secessionists political leaders with force, but I doubt it. Even in the event of it becoming a true civil war, the rest of the United States is absolutely massive. There’d be no way of defending against all of the avenues of attack. Air superiority would be established immediately by surrounding AFBs, mobile AA systems, and returning aircraft carriers. Naval blockade would prevent any foreign aid from reaching the West Coast. Lack of any real microchip processing plants would make the proliferation of modern arms impossible…

                I just can’t see any other outcome than those government leaders being arrested, replaced, then any secession being nullified and reversed by the newly installed government officials. Though if you are able to think of something, I’d be open to thinking of a potential rebuttal.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      More than half of everything grown in this country goes to agriculture.

      Go fucking vegan!