• JanoRis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Sounds kinda like they are trying to grab ā€œpowerā€ aka. growing their community more than others through exclusivity.

    Well if that turns out to be the case other communities can probably just block them in return, but still not a fan of that development

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      Isnā€™t federation symmetrical? So if they defederate most of the Fediverse, they will not be able to interact with it?

      I think itā€™s logical to keep it that way.

      • XanXic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Theyā€™re prompting the devs to make defederation one way. So they can block the fediverse at large from interacting with them but their users still have access to everything. Sets a bad example. The pitch is a pooled community. Not a series of tiny insulated Reddits using the same software

      • AntY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        I agree. It makes it cost a bit more to defederate and therefore more valuable to keep everything open and available. The best thing with reddit was that it was a one-stop shop while itā€™s a bit more confusing with this federation stuff. If this defederation wasnā€™t a two-way street, it would make for weird exclusive instances that could thrive on others content without contributing.

    • falconfetus8@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      I got that vibe when I saw that they intentionally keep their rules vague, to make them harder to evade. That just sounded to me like a recipe for power tripping.