• NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    ·
    1 month ago

    Theodore John Kaczynski, also known as the Unabomber, was an American mathematician and domestic terrorist.

    Thanks, Wikipedia.

    • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Dude got tired of maths, moved to a cabin in the woods to live by himself. Part of the woods he lived in was destroyed by loggers and road builders. He got mad and started a bombing campaign against people who he views destroy nature.

      • NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        He also went full reactionary sexist and homophobe. Plus bombed random people like a guy selling computers.

        I really dislike the way he’s venerated by some. There are actual revolutionaries with cohesive ideologies that properly critique society and direct anger at systemic problems. This guy was just mad things were changing.

        • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          He definitely had some problematic opinions. Namely he thought that modern feminist and gay rights type movements were distracting from bigger problems. Though he did actually get that ideological idea from Marx who theorised that the owner class distracts the worker class with disputes over social rights of marginalised peoples to distract from the bigger problem in society (which marx viewed as the owner classes monopoly on ownership of means of production, while Kaczynski viewed it as techno-industrial society which removes people far from their natural behaviour (self reliance and sustenance) and destroys the nature which makes it possible.)

          Not sure that qualifies him as a “full on reactionary” though. And I’m not sure I agree with your dismissal of his writings as “just mad things were changing”. They’re quite thorough and rigorous. He spent a couple decades writing multiple theoretical works to back up his views. We had an entire class on them at the masters level in social theory.

          • NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Marx doesn’t come down against rights though, Ted did. He specifically wrote about how women should be subservient to men, it’s vile stuff.

            • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Really? We never covered that in my class? And I even read his later letters and stuff. Though I do remember reading a letter that apoligised to women and gay people because he thought he had had bigoted opinions towards them earlier in life, so that probably is what he’s referencing. Our professor must not have put that in the reading list. Good to know, thanks.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    1 month ago

    From his Wikipedia page

    In 2012, Kaczynski responded to the Harvard Alumni Association’s directory inquiry for the fiftieth reunion of the class of 1962; he listed his occupation as “prisoner” and eight life sentences as “awards”.

    lol

  • psmgx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    We had to read his manifesto for a polisci class.

    Uncomfortably prescient in many ways, esp. related to technology… But also still full of wingnut BS about other stuff. Worth a read, though, if you’re bored

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      He continued writing and publishing until at least as recently as the second edition of Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How in 2020 and the most recent edition of Technological Slavery in 2022–he committed suicide after stopping cancer treatments in 2023. His books have actually received some positive academic reviews. I haven’t read them, but I’ve read the reviews.

      • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’ve read most of his collections of letters and books and they are decent. I don’t like the ways he critiques leftism (but hey I’m a leftist so that’s to be expected). Apart from that, he has some interesting theories.

        Also the cancer suicide makes more sense when you realise his father did the exact same thing.

    • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      How does one get access to said manifesto without immediately being put on an FBI watch list?

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You’re on a list for asking that. Hell, you were probably already on a list for using a non-mainstream social media.

        There’s a lot of fucking lists, they’re really more for adding on more crimes if you’re ever arrested/charged with something rather than active surveillance if you ask me.

  • HN82@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have conflicting feelings about him, because in many things, I realize today that he was right. More about technologies imho.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The fact that he did wrong things (bombings) doesn’t invalidate the things he was right about (how humans are using technology is destroying the environment) .