• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 小时前

    The claim was that Discovery was too in-your-face about this stuff. I don’t think you can get more in-your-face than that without Kirk turning to the camera and saying, “get it? GET IT?!”

    • kshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      30 分钟前

      I’d say making an obvious analogy is being less in-your-face than transplanting one of today’s problems onto the Federation’s future society. The layer of fiction is what makes it effective IMO.

      Nobody will feel called out by the ridiculously hate-filled half-black half-white aliens, but if one group was black and the other was white it would be a different story. Making them green and purple would also be less effective because people could just map those to human skin tones. That, I think, is what people would find in-your-face. Doing it the way they did on TOS (aliens of the week that literally look the same except mirrored, no clear good/bad side) puts the ridiculousness of the concept itself front and center, not how the story could be a direct translation of our current issues. And it allows the protagonists to react accordingly as well.

      The black-and-white aliens aren’t a subtle analogy but I think it’s smarter than people give it credit for.