The interval between the onset of symptoms and death has been 48 hours in the majority of cases, and “that’s what’s really worrying,” Serge Ngalebato, medical director of Bikoro Hospital, a regional monitoring center, told The Associated Press.

The latest disease outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo began on Jan. 21, and 419 cases have been recorded including 53 deaths.

According to the WHO’s Africa office, the first outbreak in the town of Boloko began after three children ate a bat and died within 48 hours following hemorrhagic fever symptoms.

  • gamer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is a dumb framing. People want to stop climate change to protect themselves and their loved ones from having to live in an inhospitable hellscape and doom humanity to extinction, not because of an emotional connection to the actual planet.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      To me it’s ridiculous that we have no reverence for our actual, objective God: the living Earth.

      All the fairy tale imaginary sky daddies people kill other people over while actively desecrating our factual creator with abandon.

      We’re so weird. We have a creator. The natural world. And we’ve been in a hot war with that only actual God of humans for about a quarter millenia, lol.

      We’ll lose handily. And life will go on.

      • luminaree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        There are definitely religious and spiritual systems that revere nature, like paganism. It’s the only thing that really makes sense to me.

        • Allonzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Certainly not plenty, given what’s happening.

          And I don’t mean empty rhetorical reverence.

          Reverence would mean having a zero to positive net environmental impact. Like the Native Americans. They weren’t perfect or necessarily peaceful between one another, but they practiced reverence towards the natural world.

          Those with practiced reverence towards the natural world don’t fare well amongst our species. We take humble coexistence with the Earth as weakness like clockwork. We jail them for ecoterrorism and genocide their cultures because they get in the way of economic and population metastasis, sadly because we consider our God to be subject to us and not the other way around as we’re going to learn in the coming decades by our own actions and hubris.

          I mean “learn” loosely. Sadly many wouldn’t admit to themselves we were wrong or abandon currency as their god even if a CAT 6 just hurled a bus at their head.

          • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            That’s subjective as it depends on your definition of reverence and of plenty.

            That said, it’s a very good point you raised initially and I wholeheartedly agree that it’s a bit weird.

            I agree that the natural world is, for all intents and purposes, analogous to a god.

            I also agree that everyone, particularly the most pious of us, seem determined to disregard this god.

            Religion is the wrong word, but I do wish that there was more focus on building appreciation for the natural world.

            I’m reminded of the “solar punk” movement. There’s an instance slrpnk.net which collates some of these ideas.