• darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why do people find it acceptable to use the bizarre word “sideloading” for the fundamental operation of “installing one’s own software on one’s own device”?

    • archchan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Corpo marketing to obfuscate the idea of installing software and nurture dependency to pre-installed proprietary repositories for an entire crowd of dependent non-tech savvy users that doesn’t know what an apk is probably.

      I avoid using the term unless I’m being cheeky about “sideloading” from Google Play.

    • centof@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because the media uncritically parrots the companies PR talking points and then it’s suddenly the accepted terminology.

    • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, it’s the word I’ve heard used for this all my life, and it’s much shorter than “installing software without an app store”.

      It’s not bad journalism to use terms of art.

    • commander@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The powers that b really were ahead of the game when they introduced smartphones to the masses (dumbasses).

      They were keen to make sure that the upset to their power structure that the digital revolution initially caused never happens again.