• Compactor9679@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “T” does not fit, hahahha. Literally gay means therr are 2 genders, same with Lesbian. Damn the word ‘bisexual’ literally means there are 2 sexualities. Hahahhaha

      • Metaright@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        To make a long story short, the idea of gender as distinct from sex results in a lot of circular reasoning, or contradiction if you try to work around that circular reasoning.

        • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That gender and sex are distinct is academically uncontroversial. Sociology in particular likes to dive into that issue.

          • Metaright@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I believe it is demonstrable that social science as a field has been a victim of intense ideological capture, considering that publishing anything that goes against that distinction is a good way to lose your job. When arguments against it aren’t allowed, you can’t rightly point to the lack of arguments against it.

            • PugJesus@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I believe it is demonstrable that social science as a field has been a victim of intense ideological capture,

              Big yikes.

    • kitonthenet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “LGB Alliance” is an astroturf front group for the heritage foundation that’s led by straight people, hope that helps!

    • nac82@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You really thought to pull up and just shout “I read and believe bigot propoganda”.

      What did you think you proved here?

  • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trans isn’t really the same sort of thing as Lesbian/Gay/Bi/Ace (which all describe sexual partner preferences not gender identities/expression) and I think that confuses people sometimes

    • Foreigner@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And? Trans individuals were fighting alongside the rest of us for gay rights, gay marriage, etc, since the very beginning. People forget it was the out, loud and proud “freaks” and “weirdos” that spearhead the movement because they were brave enough to speak out when the rest of us couldn’t/wouldn’t. Many of them were trans individuals who put themselves in danger for the cause. Now the heat is off us and is on them, and we hang them out to dry because some people “might be confused”? Anyone with this mentality can please fuck right off.

      • ReallyKinda@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never said there should be no solidarity, but Trans people were/are also huge civil rights activists and we haven’t added races into the acronym—was just pointing out that it can cause confusion.

  • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The biggest problem with the Trans specific community is that there’s a lot of hesitation from within and surrounding allies to call out the crazy stuff that’s being pushed. Most people are okay, for example, with queer books being in schools. Most people are not okay with pornography in certain books. Can’t we push queer books that talk about age-appropriate sexuality without pictures of people giving blow jobs to strap-ons? My mom would have had a fit if she found anything like that between straight couples in my school library.

    So, it comes out that some books contain this explicit material, and instead of the queer activists/supporters saying: “Alright, yeah, this material shouldn’t be here. How about replacing them with these queer books that don’t contain explicit material?” They said: “fuck you, there’s nothing wrong with this, you’re just a bigoted transphobe.”

    That’s where we’re losing a lot of support. Because most people draw a line at explicit material for those underage. If they physically see that it’s there, and advocates are shouting that it’s not there (and if it is there, that it’s a good thing anyway 🙄) then rational supporters are going to take a big step back and say “whoa, that’s going too far.” And you’re going to get some who say: “yeah, let’s take it all out, at least until we can be sure the explicit stuff is gone.” The tactic of denying that the explicit stuff exists in the face of reality does not work. It causes people to pull away instead of supporting the overall goal.