• Orvanis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah the benefits seem to be greater on the marine side…

      But even then how much better they are is essentially unknown with an awful lot of drawbacks. They weigh more which is problematic for drones, are significantly more complex to manufacture and thus are more expensive.

      So unless they can quantify how much better (and for those cons they need to be significantly better) I don’t see this gaining any traction.

        • brianorca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          For now, they are prohibitively expensive due to the monopoly that Sharrow has with their patent. But there are other ways, such as jet ducts, to protect wildlife. But it’s not so easy to retrofit a jet into an existing boat.

  • Communist@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s amazing that the world is still seeing innovation on something as simple as a propeller, the limits of science are so vast!

  • netwren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Curious. Could you 3d print a propeller or does it demand some sort of higher quality manufacturing process? For a DIY drone project slapping some toroidal propellers just to test it out seems doable.

    • GoldenSpamfish
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s been done a lot, but its kinda pointless as any noise improvements from the shape are obliterated by the bad surface finish.