• shanghaibebop@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Devils advocate, most off the shelf mass market electronics are actually quite reliable. Having custom made hardware often means poor firmware support, extreme costs, and difficult to debug.

    Nothing wrong with using off the shelf electronics, especially since the interior of the submarine is atmospheric pressure.

    • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have no idea if they actually had spares, but there’s something to be said for having three $30 off the shelf parts over one $200 custom part, provided that failure isn’t immediately catastrophic.

        • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Ahh, good to know, thanks! So we can scratch that off of the list of stupid things they did, although the lack of a transponder beacon and a surface egress option are still pretty high on the list.

          • Panthios@vlemmy.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even if they were to surface. The latch is only able to be opened from outside. So unless they are found they will still die in 40 hours.

          • shapesandstuff@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            At least they seem to have had several ways of surfacing, including at least 2 options without power and 1 deadman switch kinda situation with hooks releasing ballast after a certain amount of time.

    • anaximander@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plus Logitech gear is, in my experience, pretty well made. My Logitech joystick lasted easily ten years, and I’ve got a Logitech mouse that’s about twelve years old and still works fine.

  • sub_o@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read that military used Xbox controller because it was more intuitive than traditional method.

    But I do hope that they update / change their gamepad regularly, because thumbstick drift is a thing.

    • Freeman@lemmy.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean there is something to be said for KISS (keep it simple stupid) principles. Especially in an environment that is very unforgiving. In fact in SCUBA there is even a rebreather named as such [1].

      And something like an xbox controller is both well engineered and quite intuitive. That said…you are going to want redundancy.

      For example I believe SpaceX Dragon uses largely off the shelf computers running linux [2], and not the older rad hardened versions many other space programs require. That said…they also setup them as a to work in triplicate to ensure quorum on the data validity and then have a backup set fo computer in case they cant get quorum out of the primary.

      [1] https://www.kissrebreathers.com/

      [2] https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/9243/what-computer-and-software-is-used-by-the-falcon-9

    • hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s even funnier than that. Appearently, for drones they made drone pilots design their optimal input device, and the result was basically a replica of a commonly used Xbox controller. The legal department was dumbfounded because there’s obviously protections for an Xbox controller and they just resorted back to the original.

  • wjrii@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    More than the game controller and light bar, the bigger issue with this thing seems to be that it has no means of egress if lost but floating, and that the pressure vessel seems to be from titanium and carbon-fiber which, while strong and light, are brittle and therefore are more likely fail catastrophically. Navy subs creak and flex as they descend because the steel adjusts to the increased pressure. Steel will flex elastically along a good strength curve, and when it does fail, you have a little bit of wiggle room where it starts crushing like a can but might not split or pull away from the bolts.

    Steel is heavy though, and this thing was mean to be carted from ship to ship and unhooked with store-bought bungee cords. The whole thing is scary AF and if that price tag still left them at a point where they were feeling like they needed to use consumer-grade parts, then maybe there just wasn’t a viable business there.

  • pavlov@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The article mentions that this isn’t the first time this sub has gone missing. Is it just common for these things to drop communication for hours at a time? Seems reckless and scary

    • shiftenter@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article states that they’ve been lost before, but that they still had contact with the surface. Sounds like this is the first time comms has been lost.

  • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You could do worse than Logitech. I got the F310 from a Goodwill for like, five dollars, and it’s perfectly competent, if not top shelf quality. I could see remotely piloting a submarine with one. (At least it’s not STD, the controllers that give you herpes.)

    • Radioaktvt@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      What doesn’t surprise me is that wealthy adventure enthusiast billionaire would think it’s okay to cheap out on something supposed to sustain his life underwater. $30 game controller? Plumbing pipe for ballast? Off the shelf monitors? Is that picture showing they done even have any seats or way to strap in safely? Bolted in from the outside without a safety escape built in? I feel they would have been better off trying to go at it with an old timey diving bell attached to the surface with an air hose. That would have been even cheaper than this underwater coffin they built. At least then they would have been tethered and retrievable.

      • Fauxreigner@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What doesn’t surprise me is that wealthy adventure enthusiast billionaire would think it’s okay to cheap out on something supposed to sustain his life underwater.

        I find that surprising, actually. Cutting safety standards that protect customers? Totally in line with expectations, but normally that doesn’t touch the billionaire themselves. The fact that his negligence may have killed him instead of just ending up as a cost of doing business fine for killing other people is… appropriate, I guess?