• TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read the article, and I agree with Freddie deBoer. This is just liberal apologetics. This is just the same arguments of things are getting better, just wait, blah, blah, blah. I’m old. It’s tired. Give me healthcare and change my mind.

      • bleph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, it is literally liberal apologetics in that it’s an argument that defends the “liberal” position.

        So let me ask you then:

        Given the political realities laid out quite clearly in the article (essentially, socialism isn’t that popular), what do you think American leftists should be spending their political capital on this cycle in order to get the best policy results in the next presidential term?

      • bleph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So until we get single payer healthcare, you won’t be happy with any other policy wins and you’d rather burn all your political capital fighting us instead of uniting against the literal fascists? Please tell me how that makes sense.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The left, the real socialist left doesn’t have political capital. So there’s nothing to burn. Incremental policy is great to alleviate suffering, but ultimately is masturbatory. Fascism will eventually overcome America. This explains why. Waiting for real, substantial policy changes with climate change happening is denialism. We’re waiting for enough people to realize this so we can organize and fight for the future.

          • bleph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I found that argument very unconvincing.

            I think the author’s definition of fascism is nonsensical and ahistorical.

            I agree that capitalism has the tendency to concentrate power (like every other social or political system ever in the history of humans), but the idea that we should just abandon the levers of power to the kind of people who want Donald Trump to be president is so insane to me.

            The author even concedes that Donald Trump is uniquely bad but then bends over backwards trying to get back to his comfortable “both sides” narrative

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree that it is insane to concede power to fascism. I have kids and will be voting for Biden for this reason. I’m aware that when full fascism comes, it will not be pretty. But I also understand that capitalism will eventually decay into fascism. So, I am sympathetic to those that want to do something outside the system of just voting. I’m not trying to change your mind. I’m just trying to make people understand the situation we’re in.

              • bleph@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well I’m glad I don’t have to have the Cornel West argument here.

                I think we agree that the whole Earth is in a dangerous and precarious situation and far too many people are still not acknowledging this?

                Do you disagree that Biden has delivered more policy for the Left as a whole than any president since LBJ?

                • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Civil rights and the voter rights act were pretty big, so I don’t know. Biden has done more for the environment( he needs to do more) and that affects us all. I like Biden. I think he wants to do more. But he is beholden to the DNC and it’s corporate donors. When he gets his next term, expect him to do more.

                  • bleph@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Well if we’re talking “abolish the 2-party system” (with electoral reform) then I’m 100% agreed

          • bleph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            So … all capitalism is fascism; therefore “both sides are the same”; therefore reject incremental progress as illegitimate?

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Incremental progress is not illegitimate. It’s just never going to be enough to solve the problem that is capitalism. If it were, the New Deal would have fixed this system and we wouldn’t be having this conversation.

              • bleph@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok…so because the New Deal didn’t… overthrow capitalism forever… therefore working within the system is pointless?

        • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They probably mean something of that scale. Working people have only been losing protections, rights, and safetynets for 50 years, not gaining them, all, to lower the taxes of the sliver of the population that already wanted for nothing and got rich thanks to the system they then wanted to avoid paying back into.

          The person you’re replying to is spot on. As our roads and other commons cumble, as our public education system, that provides a pre-literate workforce that profits the oligarchs btw, sits in utter ruin due to lack of funding, as we have more prisoners per capita in the world to enrich the for profit prison industry, as the world burns from companies polluting with abandon for private profit, this rigged system has proven on no uncertain terms that it works against those who lack significant capital to further enrich those who do not. After so long, yeah, it would reasonably take a massive policy change that helps the people in significant way on the backs of against the desires of the owner to get anyone paying attention’s good will back.

          Don’t worry though, it won’t happen.

          If you want people to have faith in a system that works against them every day and has for their entire lives on the promise of “maybe you’ll kick the ball on try 10,006 Charlie Brown,” you don’t make any sense.