• SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s fun to snark on threads but yes, it had 100 million signups in a week and 50 million people still using it.

        • PeleSpirit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          First of all, does anyone trust threads to tell us real numbers? How would anyone check? Second of all, no way am I ever using them and I blocked them on my Mastodon account. If they every come to Lemmy, I’ll block them here as well. I’m not shitting on threads, the parent company has always been full of shitty people.

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imo reports of the death of threads are more hype and sensationalism. “Threads is booming” was a good tech headline, “Threads is dying” was a good tech headline. It would be perfectly expected for a ton of people to check it out at first and then use it if they want, or not. It reminds me of how in the lame city I lived in Olive Garden opened and was reservation-only for 4 months. Just because they didn’t stay reservation only doesn’t mean their launch or normal business was unsuccessful. Meta has a huge advantage in using the IG account base.