• WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    There is no one religion and they sure don’t handle conflicts with science the same way, so which one are you talking about?

    For example, Buddhism in its core is accepting of change in the world and aims to adapt.

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      which one are you talking about?

      Which is “your” religion? I’m pretty sure it isnt Buddhism. I am talking about whatever religion that puts “god” as almighty and the one who made everything including us.

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I dont have one, but its an important part of peoples lives, so i think about this stuff.

        The point being, that i have less issues with that way of resolving conflicts between your believes and scientific facts.

        • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thoose “god belivers” are like against spirit of science. Not scientific facts but scientific spirit of accepting that we have much more things to know and cannot put a god as someone who made everything the way it is, without questioning.

          • WallEx@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Some might be, but certainly not everyone. Religious people are also individuals

            • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I am saying this about the fact that people belive “god made everything”. I do understand religious people are individuals and i am targeting the belief in god not the individuals