Red_Scare [he/him]

  • 6 Posts
  • 176 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 19th, 2020

help-circle

  • I do think leaving diamat to specific philosophy studies and instead teaching people about contemporary geopolitics and economics would make society much less susceptible to liberal propaganda.

    I don’t think diamat is central to Lenin at all. If you think it is, please explain how.

    I’m sorry to say but Stalin’s ramblings about it are complete gibberish, he will for instance say “all things in nature change and diamat is about change so diamat is a natural science” which is not what makes a theory scientific (that would be the application of the scientific method which has nothing to do with diamat).

    Diamat is completely unnecessary to understand geopolitics and economics and a few modern economists I’ve read e.g. John Smith, Paul Cockshott, Zack Cope, never even mention it.

    But I didn’t read much Marxist theory, I can’t say I’m well read in general, frankly I don’t remember a lot from what I learned in childhood and I don’t have that much time and energy to read dense theory nowadays so I’m open to have my mind changed, just not by pompous proclamations and thinly veiled accusations of “revisionism” like in your reply.

    (Edit) Kwame Nkrumah also didn’t need dialectics to formulate neocolonialism. The list goes on.

    Also a nice false dichotomy there between diamat and liberal economics, very productive.



  • nope, i’m too old for podcasts

    we had to learn diamat in the USSR, I wish they put more effort into teaching contemporary geopolitics and economy rather than dry philosophical bullshit that has little to do with real world. Looking back, Soviet society was astonishingly politically illiterate and I think this is part of why people so easily let go of achievements of previous generations.

    diamat was by far the most hated subject. the boredom was palpable. you don’t need diamat to understand how the world works is what i meant.









  • In the meantime, Nazbols (obviously CW, enter at your own risk):

    https://www.reddit.com/r/EuropeanSocialists/comments/1dhbnwq/

    spoiler

    For the uninitiated, the imaginary “trans genocide” is the narrative of the lgbt-ideologues (the T section mainly) claiming that there is an ongoing targeted genocide (apparently transgenders constitute a people that can be genocided in the first place!) towards transgenders in the US through, and get this, through the collective suicides of this group. The trans nation thus has become the first bringer of its own genocide in history, hilarious. Although perhaps they’re not so far from the truth, what else can self-inflicted sterilization en masse be called? They seem to be intent on culling themselves from the gene pool…