• AppleTea
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago
    *Kinda hard to have an equal discussion when being a woman entails being sexually harassed and occasionally assaulted by a bunch of men, mostly ones you barely know or don’t know at all, on a regular basis before you even hit puberty.*
    

    genuine question, how do you expect it to get any better if you aren’t being civil?

    The decision matrix here isn’t [civil engagement ||or|| uncivil engagement], but rather:

    [civil engagement and incur non-zero risk of uncivil retaliation ||or|| do not engage]

    Non-participation is the safer option, broadly speaking. If your speaking with a stranger, it’s better to let a minor slight slide, than to engage civilly. As you get to know someone better, as you become more familiar with conditions, this chart becomes a secondary consideration or even unnecessary. But with strangers, you never know if you’re dealing with an outlier.

      • SUPAVILLAIN@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Considering it’s a whole lot of aggrieved bullshit revolving around civility-haranguing, you’re lucky the harangued respondent even gave that much. Posts like this are deadass why when debate pervs start debate perving to that magnitude, I respond with “I’m real happy you feel that way but I’m not reading all that shit”

        Cause I want the 10 minutes it took me to get through all that ego-brain bullshit returned to my possession