• Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    I actually disagree with that. Why would Einstein be smarter than a hair stylus?

    • DarkroomDoc@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is stupid. Noting that there is a bell curve of some innate talent we label intelligence is like noting there’s a bell curve on a person’s height.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sure.

        What makes you think that the hair stylist doesn’t have a lot of “innate talent” that just never presented itself due to environment and circumstance?

        • DarkroomDoc@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Fine. It’s not even a concession to say that people are a mix of nature and nurture. But people assume that saying there exists such bell curve for intelligence is the same thing as saying that people’s worth is on a bell curve, and no one is suggesting that (or at least I’m not).

          It’s ok to say that there exists natural differences between people.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        My point was what makes a person intelligent? Einstein is a particularly interesting example as he failed school. He also had a very bad sense of style and to my knowledge was not good at cutting hair. In that respect, a good hair dresser is far superior. They are way better at being a hair dresser than Einstein.

        We all have talents. It just is a matter of finding what we love. Also it helps to we willing to learn as you can be as smart as can be but still be lazy.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The reason for testing is that people on either end of the bell curve need to be educated differently to the people in the middle and to each other

    • BezzelBob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      A man who single handedly created: Brownian movement, which helped prove the existence of atoms and molecules. Thequantum theory of light, which explained how light can be both particles and waves. Thespecial theory of relativity. Which explains that time and motion are relative to the observer. The link between mass and energy E = mc2, which also forms much of the basis for nuclear energy

      This man basically discovered and explained the universe’s workings before we even had the technology to prove him right

      … vs a person who makes hair look pretty

      I have to ask. What makes you think we’re all the same intelligence?

      Because if we did consider everyone the same, it would take away credit and undermine the people who discovered all these amazing accomplishments. It’s the same reason we don’t view Olympic athletes the same as college athletes, they simply aren’t the same. Removing people’s uniqueness doesn’t create equality, it just creates a depressing dystopia where everything is the sameness, nothing has character, and nothing is unique. Kind of like the beginning of Fahrenheit 451 where everything is black and white because God forbid someone has a different favorite color

      Instead we should be celebrating the fact that there are people like Einstein and inspire to be like them, and work towards that level of intelligence. Not pull them down because we aren’t on their level