• Chronographs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d never even heard of it, I feel like cheap large flash drives and streaming killed the main use cases for these.

    • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 days ago

      i think that’s it. We used to use CD-Rs and DVD-Rs to record playlists and movies, respectively. Data hoarders today will prefer multi-hard drive servers over burning everything to Bluray, and for one-time file transfers, we have flash drives and online file shares. I just can’t think of a use case for BR-R that isn’t better served by a different technology.

        • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          When the tape drive fails and eats your tape in the process, you better hope you have a second backup or you’ll be crying salty salty tears.

          I worked in the service center for a tape-drive manufacturer and I would routinely see the drives we got back for repair. They were often taken apart by the customer in a frantic and desperate attempt to get their cassette out. The cassette was almost always still in there though, with multiple feet of tape snagged and wound around everything.

          • Natanael@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Tapes themselves are cheaper, but the drive (and potentially operating cost?) can definitely be higher for the industrial stuff

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Presumably when we’re talking off-site backups we’re talking about a separate company sitting somewhere in an abandoned nuclear bunker which can justify the price of a tape drive or twenty.