• Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Unit files, sockets and systemctl

    Stop it Patrick, you’re scaring him!

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What “scares” me the most is the journal… for some reason it takes too long to get specific unit logs, and should anything break down in it, there is no way for me to fix it. Like logging has been solved forever, and I prefer specific unit logs to the abomination of journalctl.

      But like unit files are everywhere, and systemctl at its core is a nice cmd utility.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The thing with journalctl is that it is a database. Thus means that searching and finding things can be fast and easy in high complexity cases but it can also stall in cases with very high resource usage.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Thing is that they could have preserved the textual nature and had some sort of external metadata to facilitate the ‘fanciness’. I have worked in other logging systems that did that, with the ability to consume the plaintext logs in an ‘old fashioned’ way but a utility being able to do all the nice filtering, search, and special event marking that journalctl provides without compromising the existence of the plain text.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            59 minutes ago

            Plain text is slow and cumbersome for large amounts of logs. It would of had a decent performance penalty for little value add.

            If you like text you can pipe journalctl