• Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    30 days ago

    I can’t think of a us case honestly. The ARM architecture isn’t well supported and the System76 Tax will make it pricey.

    • tekato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      arm64 is very well supported by the Linux kernel. What makes you say it’s not?

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        There is more than just the kernel. Sure there is software that works on arm but I don’t see the competitive advantage even if the workload fully supports it.

        • tekato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          There is more than just the kernel

          This is a developer desktop. Its purpose is to develop software for the ARM architecture, therefore all you need for this machine is kernel support and development tools, all of which support ARM.

          I don’t see the competitive advantage

          What about being able to compile and test for the targeted architecture? For example, Ampere-based servers are increasingly being deployed, I don’t think there’s a car out there running x86, and Apple started a trend of ARM based laptops. There’s a new architecture in mainstream computing and those who have native ARM machines to test their products on have an advantage over those who don’t.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        Markup for system76 hardware. It isn’t terrible but you are paying for System76 and usually its cheaper to go elsewhere if you are looking at purely cost.