Well put. Haven’t personally gotten to her yet but from what I’ve seen in videos, the fight looks really good. Thanks for sharing!
Interesting to hear people enjoying DOOM boss fights. I’ve not enjoyed a single one of them, to my knowledge, apart from the Marauder if you want to call it a boss fight. The ideas are cool in a vacuum, but the gameplay is not something I really want or appreciate about DOOM games
Yes, that’s the intended first boss that is obvious. You can instead go the other way, where the old lady is sitting that gives you the banner. Kill her, she drops a quest item for later, and the dancer spawns. She is most often than not too high level for most people to confront that early, but some people do it for the added challenge. You get a single endgame location early for it, but cannot progress through archives since the door is locked and you need a key you get by following the “normal” path.
The lore is both Vordt and Dancer were changed into monsters to guard people “spawning” on high wall of lothric from progressing further. She guards one path, Vordt guards the other.
You can always do it as long as the grandma is alive. Just revisit it and kill her. Technically when you go in for the actual dancer fight, the grandma is dead, and picking up the quest item triggers the fight. So by killing her you just accelerate it a little bit
Totally understand your stance on DOOM, it’s honestly why 2016 is my favourite of the bunch - precisely because it doesn’t much conform to what DOOM was and became again.
Is Eternal more similar to oldschool DOOM? I was under the impression that 2016 is similar to the OGs and that Eternal’s departure from that direction is what made it so controversial.
To me, Eternal feels like all the good stuff from 2016 but cranked to 11: the soundtrack is bangin, the gunplay feels weight, snappy, responsive, the “parkour” elements implemented in the arenas made the game feel really dynamic and fast-paced. All around just a really solid successor.
To me, yeah, Eternal feels like they upgraded the ethos of old-school DOOM with contemporary mechanics. They both feel like bullet hell games, in a way.
2016, on the other hand, felt more like Titanfall 2, to be honest, an adventure FPS with hardcore mechanics, and narrative gameplay (feels like it tells more of a story through the context, combat and environment than Eternal does - Eternal feels more like themed arenas to me, just like the originals).
Which is why I can’t bring myself to finish Eternal!:)) I’ve played through about 75% of the Campaign and I always try to find as many secrets as possible, but I just don’t feel the pull to go through with it… Every time I try, it just makes me wanna reinstall 2016.
That’s so interesting! It shows that people do value very different things for the same experiences - that’s awesome. I value story-telling a lot and enjoy environmental story-telling too - duh, check the community - but DOOM 2016 felt a little too cryptic to me at times. Maybe it’s to do with me not having been into this narrative style yet back when I played the game but it felt like the game dragged on too long. I hindsight, I probably would enjoy the game’s narrative a little more today. But the gameplay just feels so slow compared to Eternal’s if that makes sense. It’s a different style of gameplay in a way though, so that’s fine.
I had the same experience with Eternal, sorta, in that I couldn’t make myself finish the game, the only reason being is that I get bored of games a little too quickly for my taste. I think I was missing like 3 levels or so and wanted to move on to the DLC but put it off for ages. Finally got around to it again, enjoyed the couple remaining levels and got the wind blown out of my sails with the final boss of the game. Actually had to turn the difficulty down because the fight was so frustrating to me lol. And didn’t get to play the DLC either despite owning it.
Will you be checking out the upcoming DOOM game? What’s it called, The Dark Ages, or something?
Yepyep, I get what you mean by slower pace, and I agree! 2016 felt like a rhythm game, whereas Eternal gets very frantic. Dunno, maybe that’s why I love it, it also synchronises really well with the soundtrack, so the entire game feels like tech-stepping your way through a demon mosh pit, if it makes sense. It’s also not as difficult once you get into the rhythm of things, and the missing extra movement mechanics they’ve added in Eternal do slow it down even more. But I’m coming at it more as an Unreal Tournament 2004 player than a DOOM player.
You may also be right about enjoying 2016 more now, it has sooo many subtle elements strewn across the maps, almost like exploring the game more than I do killing the demons!
Oooh, yes, it is an unexpectedly difficult game at the worst of times! Feels overtuned waaay too often (which is another element 2016 gets better, imo, as it’s a bit more flexible in how it allows you to approach a combat situation), even down to jump distances - there have been many ledges I failed to reach because I didn’t wait for the very last millimetre of ground before pressing Space.
And you’ve hit the nail on the head, winded! That’s exactly how I felt by the time I stopped playing, winded. Played it through on Medium/Normal/whatever because it’s one of my fixations, but it sure was a slog at times…
Now that I think about it, I also like DS2 more than 1 or 3 for many of the same reasons, so it may just be me:))
Edit because I forgot: I didn’t even know they were planning on making another one! I’ll probably check it out, but Eternal taught me to manage my expectations, unfortunately…
Never played UT since I didn’t grow up with it. First FPS experiences I’ve had were CS 1. 6 that I watched my older brother play, Turok, Star Wars Battlefront, that kinda stuff. Must feel cool to have a game somewhat similar in style then?
You take the good with the bad, I guess. Most of the time, traversal and jump’n’run sections work quite well, especially in combat. Some platforming sections felt a little off, tho, true.
So you’re a contrarian then :P Can’t comment on DS2 since I haven’t played it at all but from what I’ve heard, some people enjoy it the most because it had the freshest ideas of them all and felt like a good continuation of DS1. DS3, while great and regarded as the second best I’d wager, fails a little when it comes to the story and lore - kinda like DS1,5. Again, just paraphrasing what I’ve heard - haven’t finished any DS myself.
Cautious optimism :D I’ll see if I’ll pick the game up for cheap some time after release. Not in a hurry
Those are all good titles in and of themselves, and Turok came closest to UT in terms of combat feel, if I remember correctly:-? It does feel nice, not gonna lie! Especially since reflex shooters seem to have diminished in popularity. Luckily, though, UT2004 still thoroughly stands up as a deathmatch machine, so at least there’s that!:))
Don’t get me wrong, I did appreciate the increase in complexity in terms of verticality, traversal, combat, everything! I just think they didn’t have to be so… mean with the implementations?:))
Nah, more like very specific:))) DS2 is to DS1 and 3 as Silent Hill 2 is to Silent Hill 1 and 3, as I see it. It’s a more intimate story, even down to the stakes. I liked that “we’re just out to look for a cure” theme, it simultaneously made the goal more relatable, but it also eased the pressure of having the world’s fate on our shoulders. And it’s far more melancholic than the other two, as well! DS3 has some places where it achieves that atmosphere, but otherwise they’re unique to DS2. And I enjoyed the new mechanics, too! It’s the only one in which I truly feel comfortable not using a shield and engaging groups, other than Elden Ring.
And just to give you more reason to call me a contrarian, I guess, I prefer DS3 over DS1. Sure, I miss the intertwined level designs from the first, but the characters are more complex in their portrayals, I found, the themes it covers fit well in terms of “this is the last one, let us do something else now,” the mechanics are far more refined, the combat is more fluid… If someone were to remake DS2 with DS3’s mechanical refinement, that would be a perfect game for me!
True, that seems to be the best choice either way, given how positively broken most games are at launch nowadays…
I’ll see if I give 2016 another go :) Have quite a huge backlog :x
I totally get what you mean :D
Oh yea, I feel you. It does sound right up my alley since I feel like most media these days goes for bigger, better, more grand storylines and just loses itself in the weeds. For example, Stranger Things 1 was a very confined story, limited to the scope of the town, the protagonists and a single unknown entity that was unnatural and unexplainable. By the end of series, so far it least, we’ve got five different storylines at the same, a cast of like 20 people all with varying degrees of importance to the overall plot, and suuuper high stakes. It sounds like DS2 is more like ST1 then, in a sense? I don’t know if that comparison makes sense :D
I think if I got around to playing the games, I’d dig DS3 more than DS1 too. I appreciate DS1 for its significance for the genre and trailblazing, but so much of the game feels really dated. Bloodborne was my first soulslike and DS3, at least what I’ve played so far, didn’t feel too far away from that. Now DS2.3, that’d be something :D
I don’t think the game will be that expensive too further down the line. I think I snatched Eternal for like 20€ a couple years ago
![[DS] Pinwheel Lore](https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/8feddcfb-6ad9-4983-a95a-e0e5871c53e9.webp){kind=link}
Well put. Haven’t personally gotten to her yet but from what I’ve seen in videos, the fight looks really good. Thanks for sharing!
Interesting to hear people enjoying DOOM boss fights. I’ve not enjoyed a single one of them, to my knowledge, apart from the Marauder if you want to call it a boss fight. The ideas are cool in a vacuum, but the gameplay is not something I really want or appreciate about DOOM games
You can get to her as the first boss in the game.
Dancer? Really? I thought Vordt is the first main boss
Yes, that’s the intended first boss that is obvious. You can instead go the other way, where the old lady is sitting that gives you the banner. Kill her, she drops a quest item for later, and the dancer spawns. She is most often than not too high level for most people to confront that early, but some people do it for the added challenge. You get a single endgame location early for it, but cannot progress through archives since the door is locked and you need a key you get by following the “normal” path.
The lore is both Vordt and Dancer were changed into monsters to guard people “spawning” on high wall of lothric from progressing further. She guards one path, Vordt guards the other.
Holy shit, that’s awesome. Can I still do that if I’ve progressed to the forest?
You can always do it as long as the grandma is alive. Just revisit it and kill her. Technically when you go in for the actual dancer fight, the grandma is dead, and picking up the quest item triggers the fight. So by killing her you just accelerate it a little bit
Gotcha. Thanks for the intel!
Totally understand your stance on DOOM, it’s honestly why 2016 is my favourite of the bunch - precisely because it doesn’t much conform to what DOOM was and became again.
Is Eternal more similar to oldschool DOOM? I was under the impression that 2016 is similar to the OGs and that Eternal’s departure from that direction is what made it so controversial.
To me, Eternal feels like all the good stuff from 2016 but cranked to 11: the soundtrack is bangin, the gunplay feels weight, snappy, responsive, the “parkour” elements implemented in the arenas made the game feel really dynamic and fast-paced. All around just a really solid successor.
What do you think?
To me, yeah, Eternal feels like they upgraded the ethos of old-school DOOM with contemporary mechanics. They both feel like bullet hell games, in a way.
2016, on the other hand, felt more like Titanfall 2, to be honest, an adventure FPS with hardcore mechanics, and narrative gameplay (feels like it tells more of a story through the context, combat and environment than Eternal does - Eternal feels more like themed arenas to me, just like the originals).
Which is why I can’t bring myself to finish Eternal!:)) I’ve played through about 75% of the Campaign and I always try to find as many secrets as possible, but I just don’t feel the pull to go through with it… Every time I try, it just makes me wanna reinstall 2016.
That’s so interesting! It shows that people do value very different things for the same experiences - that’s awesome. I value story-telling a lot and enjoy environmental story-telling too - duh, check the community - but DOOM 2016 felt a little too cryptic to me at times. Maybe it’s to do with me not having been into this narrative style yet back when I played the game but it felt like the game dragged on too long. I hindsight, I probably would enjoy the game’s narrative a little more today. But the gameplay just feels so slow compared to Eternal’s if that makes sense. It’s a different style of gameplay in a way though, so that’s fine.
I had the same experience with Eternal, sorta, in that I couldn’t make myself finish the game, the only reason being is that I get bored of games a little too quickly for my taste. I think I was missing like 3 levels or so and wanted to move on to the DLC but put it off for ages. Finally got around to it again, enjoyed the couple remaining levels and got the wind blown out of my sails with the final boss of the game. Actually had to turn the difficulty down because the fight was so frustrating to me lol. And didn’t get to play the DLC either despite owning it.
Will you be checking out the upcoming DOOM game? What’s it called, The Dark Ages, or something?
Yepyep, I get what you mean by slower pace, and I agree! 2016 felt like a rhythm game, whereas Eternal gets very frantic. Dunno, maybe that’s why I love it, it also synchronises really well with the soundtrack, so the entire game feels like tech-stepping your way through a demon mosh pit, if it makes sense. It’s also not as difficult once you get into the rhythm of things, and the missing extra movement mechanics they’ve added in Eternal do slow it down even more. But I’m coming at it more as an Unreal Tournament 2004 player than a DOOM player.
You may also be right about enjoying 2016 more now, it has sooo many subtle elements strewn across the maps, almost like exploring the game more than I do killing the demons!
Oooh, yes, it is an unexpectedly difficult game at the worst of times! Feels overtuned waaay too often (which is another element 2016 gets better, imo, as it’s a bit more flexible in how it allows you to approach a combat situation), even down to jump distances - there have been many ledges I failed to reach because I didn’t wait for the very last millimetre of ground before pressing Space.
And you’ve hit the nail on the head, winded! That’s exactly how I felt by the time I stopped playing, winded. Played it through on Medium/Normal/whatever because it’s one of my fixations, but it sure was a slog at times…
Now that I think about it, I also like DS2 more than 1 or 3 for many of the same reasons, so it may just be me:))
Edit because I forgot: I didn’t even know they were planning on making another one! I’ll probably check it out, but Eternal taught me to manage my expectations, unfortunately…
Never played UT since I didn’t grow up with it. First FPS experiences I’ve had were CS 1. 6 that I watched my older brother play, Turok, Star Wars Battlefront, that kinda stuff. Must feel cool to have a game somewhat similar in style then?
You take the good with the bad, I guess. Most of the time, traversal and jump’n’run sections work quite well, especially in combat. Some platforming sections felt a little off, tho, true.
So you’re a contrarian then :P Can’t comment on DS2 since I haven’t played it at all but from what I’ve heard, some people enjoy it the most because it had the freshest ideas of them all and felt like a good continuation of DS1. DS3, while great and regarded as the second best I’d wager, fails a little when it comes to the story and lore - kinda like DS1,5. Again, just paraphrasing what I’ve heard - haven’t finished any DS myself.
Cautious optimism :D I’ll see if I’ll pick the game up for cheap some time after release. Not in a hurry
Those are all good titles in and of themselves, and Turok came closest to UT in terms of combat feel, if I remember correctly:-? It does feel nice, not gonna lie! Especially since reflex shooters seem to have diminished in popularity. Luckily, though, UT2004 still thoroughly stands up as a deathmatch machine, so at least there’s that!:))
Don’t get me wrong, I did appreciate the increase in complexity in terms of verticality, traversal, combat, everything! I just think they didn’t have to be so… mean with the implementations?:))
Nah, more like very specific:))) DS2 is to DS1 and 3 as Silent Hill 2 is to Silent Hill 1 and 3, as I see it. It’s a more intimate story, even down to the stakes. I liked that “we’re just out to look for a cure” theme, it simultaneously made the goal more relatable, but it also eased the pressure of having the world’s fate on our shoulders. And it’s far more melancholic than the other two, as well! DS3 has some places where it achieves that atmosphere, but otherwise they’re unique to DS2. And I enjoyed the new mechanics, too! It’s the only one in which I truly feel comfortable not using a shield and engaging groups, other than Elden Ring.
And just to give you more reason to call me a contrarian, I guess, I prefer DS3 over DS1. Sure, I miss the intertwined level designs from the first, but the characters are more complex in their portrayals, I found, the themes it covers fit well in terms of “this is the last one, let us do something else now,” the mechanics are far more refined, the combat is more fluid… If someone were to remake DS2 with DS3’s mechanical refinement, that would be a perfect game for me!
True, that seems to be the best choice either way, given how positively broken most games are at launch nowadays…
I’ll see if I give 2016 another go :) Have quite a huge backlog :x
I totally get what you mean :D
Oh yea, I feel you. It does sound right up my alley since I feel like most media these days goes for bigger, better, more grand storylines and just loses itself in the weeds. For example, Stranger Things 1 was a very confined story, limited to the scope of the town, the protagonists and a single unknown entity that was unnatural and unexplainable. By the end of series, so far it least, we’ve got five different storylines at the same, a cast of like 20 people all with varying degrees of importance to the overall plot, and suuuper high stakes. It sounds like DS2 is more like ST1 then, in a sense? I don’t know if that comparison makes sense :D
I think if I got around to playing the games, I’d dig DS3 more than DS1 too. I appreciate DS1 for its significance for the genre and trailblazing, but so much of the game feels really dated. Bloodborne was my first soulslike and DS3, at least what I’ve played so far, didn’t feel too far away from that. Now DS2.3, that’d be something :D
I don’t think the game will be that expensive too further down the line. I think I snatched Eternal for like 20€ a couple years ago