PugJesus@lemmy.worldM to Rough Roman Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoIt's a simple questionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1299arrow-down13
arrow-up1296arrow-down1imageIt's a simple questionlemmy.worldPugJesus@lemmy.worldM to Rough Roman Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareCethinlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·12 hours agoYour correction should be “The Roman Empire…”. The city of Rome existed without a doubt. (So did the empire, but it fits what you’re saying.)
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 hour agoThe other answers use “it”, so probably that if we’re actually doing a rewrite. I’m not worried about being misunderstood here, and natural language is intrinsically imprecise. But yeah, Rome the city is still there, and actually bigger than ever.
minus-squareDroechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·8 hours ago"The city of Rome existed without a doubt… (So did the empire…) Source? https://www.popularmechanics.com/culture/a42913823/roman-empire-conspiracy-theory/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_chronology_(Fomenko) (/S)
Your correction should be “The Roman Empire…”. The city of Rome existed without a doubt. (So did the empire, but it fits what you’re saying.)
The other answers use “it”, so probably that if we’re actually doing a rewrite.
I’m not worried about being misunderstood here, and natural language is intrinsically imprecise. But yeah, Rome the city is still there, and actually bigger than ever.
"The city of Rome existed without a doubt… (So did the empire…)
Source?
https://www.popularmechanics.com/culture/a42913823/roman-empire-conspiracy-theory/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_chronology_(Fomenko)
(/S)