• Possibly linuxOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    If you are small enough there is no saucer.

    1000007273

    Also the Vulkan ships have a ring.

    1000007274

    I suppose it is whatever fits the fancy of the production crew. I assume the ring shape also creates a stable warp field. Interestingly enough, I think the Defiant had the most function design.

    1000007275

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I always really enjoyed when they would separate the saucer section in TNG, the whole 2(?) times they did it. I always thought that was a really cool concept and i liked the sleekness of the little warp fighter with the battle bridge.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      In TOS design logic, ships need two warp nacelles spaced left and right

      nacelles arranged like this has mostly been followed for the rest of Trek.

      I’m aware. There has never been a requirement for a saucer, even in TOS, and I did not say that. But the nacelles are arranged at the extremes of the ships, even in compact designs in later Trek, which does follow the established logic. Vulcan rings are a rare exception to the left and right nacelles - covered under the word “mostly”.

      • Possibly linuxOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I was mostly just trying to provide some examples other designs. You are completely correct most ships (especially Earth ones) are the classic saucer design.