Summary

Lockheed Martin UK’s chief, Paul Livingston, defended the F-35 stealth jet program after Elon Musk called it obsolete due to advances in unmanned drones.

Livingston emphasized the F-35’s unmatched capabilities, including stealth, battlefield data-sharing, and cost-efficiency by replacing multiple aircraft types.

While Musk labeled the program overly expensive and poorly designed, Livingston argued drones alone can’t match the F-35’s capabilities or defend against threats like China’s J20 jets.

Despite criticism over cost and reliability, the F-35 remains integral to NATO defenses, with widespread adoption across 19 nations, including the UK.

  • sp3ctr4l
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The cars were going to fly short distances too.

    He said he was going to use monopropellant thrusters to make his cars fly.

    Hopefully I do not need to point out the many reasons this is a very bad idea, if not functionally impossible.

    He also said he was working on an electric aircraft at one point.

    Other companies have actually made such things… not Musk though.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      if lithium battery fires were bad, i’m sure that firefighters are thrilled to see hydrazine fires, several hundreds of kg at a time, after random crashes. lmao. what the fuck was he thinking?