Summary

New York City has become the first U.S. city to implement a congestion charge, with car drivers paying up to $9 daily to enter areas south of Central Park.

The scheme aims to reduce traffic and fund public transport but has faced opposition, including from Donald Trump, who has vowed to overturn it.

Fees vary by vehicle type, with trucks and buses paying higher rates.

Despite legal challenges, the initiative moves forward as New York remains the world’s most congested urban area, with peak traffic speeds averaging just 11 mph.

  • rumba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    They see it as a tax. They don’t really like taxes.

    And honestly there’s a fair amount of stuff in lower Manhattan that can’t be adequately serviced by public transportation. Large conventions, cruise traffic, hotels. People bring their cars to those things because they want to have more than just what they can carry with them, and when they return they don’t want to have to stand around for two to three hours to get enough trains through to disperse them back to Secaucus where they parked. (And God forbid there be a breakdown in the line right there)

    If it doesn’t adequately reduce the congestion it’s just a tax. If it does adequately reduce the congestion, You’re going to put a hell of a lot of parking, hotels and convention out of business.

    Congestion charges make sense when it’s congestion just for the sake of people wanting to drive, But it doesn’t solve the reasons people are driving. New York City public transportation doesn’t have the capacity to handle these big events.

    I hate to be on Trump’s side with anything, but this issue needs some infrastructure changes along with the congestion tax where it’s going to be just a massive tax with no actual solution.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Skeptical hippo is skeptical. If people are going on a freakin’ cruise, staying at a Manhattan hotel, or attending a convention, I very much doubt another $9 is going to be a deciding factor.

      ETA: Out of curiosity, I consulted Google Maps about driving to Manhattan. It helpfully alerts me that my route would pass through a congestion zone, but does not calculate that price for me, nor add it to the $54.28 of other tolls that I would have to pay along the way.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s not going to stop people driving in entirely. It’s just going to add a cost. So that people who deem the cost “worth it” can still drive in. Like those taking a cruise.

      • rumba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        So it’s just a tax on those people for no reason. I can’t really say that I love it.

          • HowAbt2morrow@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s like paying for an extra topping on your NY style pizza. Only those that want that topping will pay for it, not everyone else.

            In countries where a having a car is considered a luxury, only those with one pay a “permission to circulate” (tax on driving) which goes to paying for road maintenance and the like. And how much you pay every year is prorated to the cost of your car. Sucks, but seems fair if you don’t have a car.

            I think this congestion tax is similar, but it the same. You pay for what you use.

    • niucllos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Doesn’t the congestion revenue explicitly help fund public transportation? Which would help mitigate a lot of the issues you bring up, there will for sure be growing pains but with smart decisions should adapt to the needs of traffic

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Eh. Money’s perfectly fungible, except for restrictions the government puts on itself through the budget process. Theoretically, they could have simply decided to pay for the MTA with existing funds, and tie the future of street maintenance to the implementation of the congestion toll. Instead, they tied the MTA funding increase to the implementation of a congestion toll, for political reasons.

      • rumba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        How much congestion tax would it take to add a new line to New Jersey to handle the offloading of big traffic?

        Looking at the numbers to fix the infrastructure, the tax is a drop in the bucket.

        Yet to the businesses in the area, it’ll severely lower their income.

        I’d hate to see Comic-Con leave the Javits center to move to New Jersey.

    • ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The difference between taxes and fees is really just that the first is cheaper and goes to people who aren’t incentivized to pocket the money while providing the worst service they can get away with. If you push a libertarian to explain their story in detail, there always comes a point where they introduce government and taxes but try to call it something else.

      • rumba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s like they try to slow roll putting themselves in charge and expect you not to notice :)

        I’m pretty sure a lot of them don’t even notice.

      • rumba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Could you imagine trying to drive in from someplace serviceable in New Jersey to have lunch and drive back out during peak? Lake Jersey can’t field reasonable restaurants ;)

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        How long are their lunch breaks? I work in a small rural town and driving somewhere for lunch still eats up about a quarter of my lunch break.