• Technus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    The very first time I saw an ad for Honey I knew there had to be a catch. Nothing is ever free.

    It wasn’t immediately obvious how they were going to make money, though. I figured they’d just sell gather and sell user data. I had completely forgotten about affiliate links. But they probably also sell your data for good measure.

    • Iapar@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only thing truly free are those little pencils at IKEA.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are plenty of free things on the Internet. You’re commenting on a free social network.

      • Technus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I pay $100/month for internet access.

        Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

        You also don’t see Lemmy paying hundreds of YouTubers and influencers for ad spots.

        • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

          Kind reminder to donate to whoever is hosting your instance. Covering a share of costs increases the chances they will continue running it.

        • Lumidaub@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I pay $100/month for internet access.

          Which you’d also pay if you used Honey.

          Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

          You also wouldn’t have paid to use Honey.

          You also don’t see Lemmy paying hundreds of YouTubers and influencers for ad spots.

          That one, that’s a valid argument.

          • Technus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            You also wouldn’t have paid to use Honey.

            That’s my point? Nothing is ever truly free?

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Wow, internet is expensive where you are. I pay £28 (about $35) a month for 1gig up/down in the UK.

          • Asterisms@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            internet in the states and canada can be so expensive :( i’m lucky that my provider has a program for ppl on disability where we pay $10-$20 CAD/mo. I can’t remember the exact amount, nor what up/down we get right now, but it’s pretty decent!

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

          “Someone” is paying to host every website. The point is it’s free to you.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I pay $100/month for internet access.

          Irrelevant to the point, but damn that feels so high. I pay something like 30 or 40 euros per month for symmetric 500 megabit, in one of the countries with the highest internet prices in Europe.

          Lemmy may be free to access, but certainly not free to host. Am I paying for it personally? No, but someone is.

          Well yes, someone is, but my point was, there are loads of examples on the Internet where something truly is free to use and hosted by someone who doesn’t ask for anything. There is real altruism to be found here.

          You also don’t see Lemmy paying hundreds of YouTubers and influencers for ad spots.

          Yes, this is where the difference comes in. When something is free AND the people running it have ridiculous amounts of money to spend on sponsorships and ads… Then you can be sure there’s a catch.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s not, my point was more that you see a lot of things being hosted on the Internet for free just out of people’s goodness and curiosity.

          Honey is not one of them. But it’s not the fact that Honey is free to use that’s the suspicious part. It’s the fact that they had an awful lot of money to spend on sponsor spots for a free product/service.

      • Shortstack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I help pay for my instance to run, nothing is free but there is freeloading. Otherwise someone is else pays for the electricity that powers my server requests as I shitpost on lemmy

      • madnotangry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lemmy isn’t paying out the nose for influencers to hook their stuff. I haven’t seen any Lemmy instances advertise at all, much less to the extent that Honey has.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, that’s the major difference, but the original comment pointed out you can’t have free things without getting assfucked one way or another. You can, but those free things don’t spend millions on advertising themselves.

        • boonhet@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s not, but go look on github. There are so many projects out there that aren’t monetized. People just built them for the fun of it.

          Hell, the entire KDE software suite is not monetized to the best of my knowledge. They ask for donations, but they don’t make a buck off you in any way unless you voluntarily donate.

      • pachrist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are so many online companies that do this, like Glassdoor. They are willing to share any information they have about a place until they’re paid to remove it. Goes for bad reviews and salary info as much as it does for coupon codes.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There was a video years and years ago where they explained their business model and it has either since changed or they lied. Back then it was that they offered deals through sponsorships or something. I don’t remember. It was years ago. What’s frustrating is that I remember seeing that video and it definitely made me think it wasn’t a scam. Probably had the same effect on a lot of other people too.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve never seen an ad for honey, not heard of it’s existence before this video.

      Ad blocking is the way

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Hmm ad blocking is not enough, because many YouTubers sponsor Honey inside of their videos. Maybe you also use Sponsorblock.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          No I didn’t use sponsor block, I often manually skip sponsored sections.

          But none of the channels I follow shill for honey, apparently, and that’s a big plus.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Frankly I’m surprised it took this long for anyone to notice they were swapping referral codes. I always assumed that was what was in it for them. Perhaps the extent to which they’ve done it is greater than we knew, but if you have ever heard of referral codes, it seems obvious that this is how such an extension would monetize.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So you don‘t use extensions at all then because you‘re already sniffing the uBlock Origin scandal?