• akash_rawal@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am not. I worked hard to make our application support RHEL 8 and then RHEL 9. And then the politics takes over and the big wigs start an extended bickering over who should pay for the OS upgrade… which never happens. Sometimes hardware partners don’t support the upgrades, which means OS upgrades also end up requiring new hardware.

      I blame Redhat.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Surely your pay is much more than a RHEL license.

        If nothing else you could move to Debian or Rocky Linux.

        • akash_rawal@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          There is something you need to know about collective wisdom; the larger the org is, the lower it gets. Yes the application works on Alma 8 and 9, but the management says ‘no’.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes and no

            A healthy organization shouldn’t be having this issue.

          • akash_rawal@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The only way that will work is to somehow quit and rejoin as a much more highly paid consultant and enable them to upgrade EOL software in prod. I am actually considering this.