• rarbg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lmao they went to Bluesky, a centralized (don’t get pedantic with me) social media platform controlled by Americans. Genius

      • dnzm@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        From boiling water into water that happens to be in a switched-on kettle. Huge improvement.

        When the enshittification comes (when, not if, they’ll have to drag their feet to move somewhere else again. All their followers will have to follow them again. Had they moved to a proper open solution, they could’ve stayed there indefinitely.

        It’s not just about Bluesky" not being the proper and pure solution", it’s about this being a temporary measure at best, and people don’t seem to realize that.

        • militaryintelligence@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Gosh I know, moving from a social media platform where its owner sig heils to a platform where its owner does not is just as bad. You’re either trolling or an idiot.

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          From boiling water into water that happens to be in a switched-on kettle. Huge improvement.

          It IS a huge improvement.

    • cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      People go to the platform that’s easy, attractive and works, instead of the very beautiful, finely crafted, exquisite solution that requires days of reading followed by fiddling every other day to barely get the same immediate result, assorted with hidden surprises like hidden moderation and silent failure situation that leads to fragmentation of the whole network. What a surprise.

      Also, “don’t get pedantic with me” does not sit well with the current goals of bluesky. Sure, right now, they focused on making something that works and is usable by everyone. Whoop fucking doo, that’s exactly what mastodon/lemmy/most activitypub services skipped. And that’s why the general public look at them with contempt. I can’t see the future (maybe you can, lucky you), but for now, bluesky works, and the plan they’re still following up to now is aimed toward a decentralized solution.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wikipedia says “direct messages are offered though a central service”. If that’s was/still is correct then you’re correct, it’s centralized.

      Nuance is the friend of truth - pedantic.

      • exu@feditown.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        The whole algorithm (AppView) is centralised. While it’s technically possible to host with enough capital, a second AppView server would also double bandwidth required for every message sent on the network. This gets worse the more AppView instances you add, as every message has to be sent to every AppView server (exponential growth)

          • exu@feditown.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            No, ActivityPub only send messages to the recipients. Uninvolved servers don’t get the message at all until one of their users explicitly searches for it.
            In the worst case where every user has their own server, one message per recipient is sent. Adding another recipient on their own server means one more message being sent and so forth.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If I had a company with public presence, I would too. Companies and organization’s go to the people are.