The Supreme Court said Wednesday it will consider whether to restrict access to a widely used abortion drug — even in states where the procedure is still allowed.

The case concerns the drug mifepristone that — when coupled with another drug — is one of the most common abortion methods in the United States.

The decision means the conservative-leaning court will again wade into the abortion debate after overturning Roe v. Wade last year, altering the landscape of abortion rights nationwide and triggering more than half the states to outlaw or severely restrict the procedure.

  • Cethin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with most of your comment, but regulation to ensure safety also has its place. That said, I mostly agree it should still be available, with a warning about safety.

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not really commenting on that, to be honest. I’m not a huge fan of many regulations, but I only get worked up about the ones that fuck us.

      Roe v Wade had a standard that was applied nowhere else and it’s frustrating nobody thought to back it up with law.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        To be fair, abortion should be covered by the 9th amendment. There shouldn’t be a need for extra laws to cover it.