Clear close-up footage. What do you all think?

  • Cethin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Looks rendered to me. Seems like there’s artifacting around it when it’s close up. Also, the cameraman seems to predict it’s movements a lot of the time somehow, which more implies they were rendering it after the fact to move with the camera or were communicating with the pilot. Maybe another drone and then rendered the sphere on top, which the size and movement would make sense for.

    Also, if this stuff were to happen this low, would this really be the first time it’s seen? Does that not make anyone suspicious? I know a lot of people just want to believe this stuff, but this isn’t it.

    • HM05@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of videos can contain rendered elements these days, which does make the discussion difficult. I’m sure someone out there will do analysis at some point, though that’s out of my wheelhouse.

      And, there are a lot of “orb” shapes reported and even recorded. The buoyant, smooth movements cause a lot to be dismissed as balloons. In a lot of cases that may be the case. While I personally don’t think objects of unknown design or origin have to have unique movements, I also understand dismissing them when there’s weak evidence. Since this video is really clear, I think it warrants more review than most. But, I’ll leave this one to experts to break down.