I’d expected this but it still sucks.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I meant you should switch to proxmox. What are you referring to?

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          oh. i don’t use vmware but i’m sure i have an old copy of proxmox laying around. i thought you were saying it’s integrated into proxmox, too

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          He should really switch to LXD/Incus, not Proxmox as it will end like ESXi one day.

            • TCB13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              LXD uses QEMU/KVM/libvirt for VMs thus the performance is at least the same as any other QEMU solution like Proxmox, the real difference is that LXD has a much smaller footprint, doesn’t depend on 400+ daemons thus boots and runs management operations much faster. The virtualization tech is the same and the virtualization performance is the same.

              Here’s one of my older LXD nodes running HA:

              It’s “so hard” to run HA under LXD… you just have to download the official HA OS image and import to LXD.

              • Possibly linux
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Sorry I meant high availability as in the ability to live transfer a VM to a different host without downtime or service interruptions.

                I hear that I lot of people are using LXC. Are you using a container runtime in the LXC container? (i.e. docker or podman)

                • TCB13@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Sorry I meant high availability as in the ability to live transfer a VM to a different host without downtime or service interruptions.

                  Oh, my bad then. But yes, like Proxmox, LXD/Incus can do live migrations of VMs since 4.20 (2021 I believe). Live migration of containers can be done under specific circunstantes as well.

                  Are you using a container runtime in the LXC container? (i.e. docker or podman)

                  In some of them yes. At least under Debian as long as you’ve set security.nesting=true it will work fine.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        LXD is not really usable for anything as it is very slow

        • TCB13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          LXD uses QEMU/KVM/libvirt for VMs thus the performance is at least the same as any other QEMU solution like Proxmox, the real difference is that LXD has a much smaller footprint, doesn’t depend on 400+ daemons thus boots and runs management operations much faster. The virtualization tech is the same and the virtualization performance is the same.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Maybe I’m just doing it wrong. I’ve just found LXD to be lacking as you can’t live transfer it to a different host. It is also slower than Docker and Podman and I was unable to get docker running in a unprivileged LXC container. I think it should be possible to run docker in LXC but by the time I spend the effort is is more secure and easier to use a full virtual machine.

            Maybe I should revisit the idea though as it seems like many people stand by it.