• vexikron
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    If you need to be able to do unions and you are doing it in javascript, you are being absurdly inefficient compared to setting up a postgres db, but i wont be able to convince you of this because of basically nonsense brainwashing from your corporate conditioning.

    EDIT: Note to self, do not use lemmy while hangry.

    Yep Im wayyyy off base here.

    • Kogasa@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Why would you need to set up a postgres db…? Unions are a fundamental set theoretic operation that are applicable to all set-like collections. You may as well say “an in memory hash map / list is absurdly inefficient compared to a relational db.” Is it efficient, to you, to spin up a postgres instance to hold a dozen key value pairs?

    • median_user@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sets are super useful for all sorts of stuff where you want the datatype to guarantee there is only one instance of a value in the collection. UI components where you are incrementally adding things to a selection is a great example.

      It’s a completely standard feature in many stdlibs and has nothing to with turning JS into a database.