I often hear folks in the Linux community discussing their preference for Arch (and Linux in general) because they can install only the packages they want or need - no bloat.

I’ve come across users with a couple of hundred packages installed (likely fresh installs), but I’ve also seen others with thousands.

Personally, I’m currently at 1.7k packages on my desktop and 1.3k on my laptop (both running EndeavourOS). There might be a few packages I could remove, but I don’t feel like my system is bloated.

I guess it’s subjective, but when do you consider a system to be bloated?

I’m asking as a relatively new Linux user - been daily driving for about 7/8 months

  • SuperSpruce
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you frequently use the software and there’s no easy alternative, is it really bloat?

      • SuperSpruce
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You said you love a system with lots of useful processes running in the background. My comment questions if these useful background processes are really bloat, at least in your system.

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I am not about to descend into a philosophical discussion of the nature of bloatware. There’s a definition somewhere, but I’d rather use the tried and true “I know it when I see it.”