• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    news at 11

    Sarcasm totally unfounded here because there are plenty of people arguing that anyone but Biden would be a better bet against Trump. But you point out one of the huge advantages of an incumbent has: name recognition.

    • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m pretty sure that disadvantage for those candidates would disappear in about 24 hours if Biden suddenly became unavailable to run and voters got told “If you don’t want four more years of Trump, vote [whoever]”

      e; an attempt at better phrasing

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s an inconvenient truth for people that Biden is the strongest and safest opponent against Trump. His incumbency advantage is significant.

      It’s possible another candidate would do better against Trump, but that’s where “safest” comes into consideration. There’s more unknowns and it’s more risky. Our best bet would be to focus on a better candidate for 2028 and get started early with them

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        His incumbency is likely to be a weight around his neck. When was the last time we had a Democratic candidate who polled worse than a Republican among Hispanics and under-35 voters? I really hope you don’t have to eat your words.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I hope I don’t either. What’s scary is we both might be right. He’s the best candidate… And this is what the best is.