• Stumblinbear@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They also had ads, which they’d no longer gain revenue from. Ads can pull in $3-5 per month per user. That’s a massive loss.

        • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Apart from the ones that pay. You only need to look at any of the sync posts on here to see there are many, many of them.

          • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ad revenue very often dwarfs the income from subscribing users by a huge margin. Sure, a single user subscribing pays for themselves plus a little extra, but your free users make up 70-80% of your revenue

            • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but again - removing the app takes away 100% of the revenue. Keeping it as subscription only gets you some revenue. Some > none.

              • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The amount of people that subscribe would likely not pay for the ongoing maintenance costs unless he’s willing to work for shit pay. Every hour he puts into maintenance is an hour he didn’t put into maintenance the other version that actually pays well enough