Basically title.

I’m wondering if a package manager like flatpak comes with any drawback or negatives. Since it just works on basically any distro. Why isn’t this just the default? It seems very convenient.

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    The upside over Snaps is that they’re not so controlled by a central source

    I’d say they still share a couple downsides: a) use a lot of them and stuff is gonna get bloaty vs native packages

    b) updating a library etc for security on your system can still leave you with vulnerable apps where the packages aren’t updated

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Snaps are very much controlled by a central source. With flatpak you can add custom repos

    • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Generally using only a few flatpaks is where it’s generally “bloaty”. Adding more actually balances out the equation ans you have more apps using generally shared runtimes.