• RiverGhost@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    We should at least have referred to the corona instead of the surface.

    When it comes to the opposite, the coldest temperature in the known universe has actually been man-made (also in lab settings).

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I only vaguely recall this, but I seem to remember reading that using lasers we can actually get things into the negative kelvins? Or maybe we get them so cold they become hot? TBH I can’t remember and it confused me when I read it, but I remember it being a reputable source

      Edit: yeah this is evidently a thing

        • Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Try this one, I found it easier to at least think I understand what it’s talking about: https://www.quantum-munich.de/119947/Negative-Absolute-Temperatures

          Basic attempt at eli16: Temperatures are defined by entropy, rather than kinetic motion like we’re used to thinking. In certain constrained systems, it’s possible to create a situation where there is a maximum energy state, and saturating the particles in the system such that they’re all close to that state creates a situation where the entropy starts decreasing (the system is less disordered since all particles are at the same maximum energy). That state where the entropy is decreasing is where negative temperatures exist.

          End attempt. Disclaimer, I’m probably wrong, having spent just a few minutes skimming these two articles and trying to summarize what I understood.