President Joe Biden, in a call Saturday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, directly tied Ukraineās withdrawal from the key town of Avdiivka to Congressā inability to pass further aid for the countryās effort to fend off Russiaās invasion.
āThis morning, Ukraineās military was forced to withdraw from Avdiivka after Ukrainian soldiers had to ration ammunition due to dwindling supplies as a result of congressional inaction, resulting in Russiaās first notable gains in months. President Biden emphasized the need for Congress to urgently pass the national security supplemental funding bill to resupply Ukrainian forces,ā according to a White House readout of the call.
The call bookended a week defined by US attempts to reassert leadership on the world stage. It also highlighted renewed urgency to pass additional funds for Ukraine amid the withdrawal from Avdiivka, a key town that in recent months became one of the most fiercely contested battles on the eastern front, and the news of Kremlin critic Alexey Navalnyās death.
It has nothing to do with the amount. From your link:
āThe Government of Ukraine has requested to buyā
That wasnāt the US giving weapons. It was Ukraine buying them. Ukraine can buy weapons at any time because purchases can be approved by the President. But giving money requires Congressional approval.
Not quite.
When we do Foreign Military Financing programs, we give a set amount of money that the other government then pays us back from, buying what they wish. So, Israel pays us for our weapons. Just, with money we gave them. They also buy weapons from us with their own money, we only cover a fairly small percentage of their total defense budget.
The Arms Export Control Act covers the situation regardless.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_Export_Control_Act
Yes but that money was already given to them by Congress. So the purchase of weapons using money they already had could be approved by Biden.
But it still falls under the purview of the Arms Export Control Act. Congress gets oversight over more than just money, if they pass a law that gives them that authority. Which they did back in the 70s.
Congress can vote on it if they want to. They arenāt required to vote. Thereās also a loophole that started in the 80ās that effectively lets the President bypass Congress because he can veto which requires another vote with a 2/3 majority to override a veto. So Congress doesnāt even bother voting.
Bypass is the wrong word there. Not having the votes doesnāt mean theyāve been bypassed.