• Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s the thing. Ethics and impact on the environment can be two different things. If you decide to go that way, you’re fine. Do it. However we need animals for stated reasons. We have to eat less meat/generally consume less animal products.

    • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      We also need to stop overproducing everything. America makes far too much corn, because/and the industry is heavily subsidized.

      The amount of food waste in North America is astounding. Completely unnecessary.

      • Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        True. That’s the same with everything. As long as it is worth to produce stuff just to throw it away we will damage our planet more and more.

      • buzz86us@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yup… I want those subsidies to shift to hemp production. So many far more useful products that will be able to be produced rather than food processors playing hide the corn. It is a drop in replacement for the ethanol in gas since the seeds are 30% oil.

        But we don’t produce hemp, and megacorps go… Here’s another ethane cracker plant.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        We do that so you can go to the store and actually find food. It’s so we don’t have another famine…has nothing to do with anything else you’re trying to point out.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yea totally, no clue what I’m talking about at all, just own a farm and understand our food economy…but nope no clue.

            • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              So you’re telling me the government uses tax payer money to prop up your farm so that… we can actually find the food at the grocery stores?

              And then with all that extra corn that you’re producing they have to find a myriad of other uses (like the syrup that making the entire country obese, for one)?

              So clearly you’re way more enlightened on the subject since you own a farm, so why don’t you tell the class why subsidizing an unnecessarily oversized industry is a good thing.

              Don’t shy away from this. You’re the expert.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Lol I don’t own an ag farm, but I’m in the farming community, and the gov. Props up farms so people like you don’t starve to death when we have a bad grow year or droughts…or any other reasons to keep the people who feed you from saying fuck this I quit.

                Yes because all farms grow is corn and create sugar drinks…also we have an issue with obesity for a ton of different reasons and it’s not because of “big corn”.

                Already did, you just don’t seem to understand that without keeping farmers afloat, the majority of them will fail and then you get to go outside and eat some grass and acorns…which the more likely thing to happen is you starve to death because you think food magically appears in the store two minutes from you.

                Can it be improved? Sure, but acting like your food you eat is somehow going to magically be cheaper and more plentiful without keeping farmers from failing after a bad year is hilarious.

                • spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  None of that changes the over abundance of the stuff I am specifically talking about. The amount of land and resources put into that industry are unnecessary. I understand what crop insurance is, and I am not trying to belittle farmers.

                  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    How so? The majority of land that cattle are on cannot be properly used for plants. The soil and climate is not suitable for pretty much any crops without massive amounts of water and soil fertilizers. Look at what they’re doing in AZ when growing alfalfa hay which is shipped over seas to rich Arab countries for their race horses. That alone is sucking the aquafers dry.

                    The over abundance is there specifically to make sure we all do not starve, the great depression is how it came about. You really don’t want a repeat of that. Millions would die.

    • QuaffPotions@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      No, animal captivity, exploitation, rape, slaughter, and consumption are all things that are very much unnecessary, and are detrimental in many ways.