Florida bans AP psychology, College Board says, because of lessons on gender identity and sexual orientation, which violate state rules.

  • JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Gee, it’s almost as if when you have such a massive shift from the DSM-IV to the DSM-V you cause a rift. Who’d a thunk.

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Florida will not allow public school students to take Advanced Placement psychology because the course includes lessons on sexual orientation and gender identity, topics forbidden by the state, the College Board said Thursday.

      No, it’s because of bigots that want to suppress people who aren’t exactly like them.

  • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m going to take a step back from the topic itself.

    I think the real problem here is that we can’t agree on what “fact” is. Both sides are certain that they are correct. Both sides can present what they believe is scientific evidence. How do we move forward from that? Both sides simply discredit the sources used in the science the other side is presenting. It seems that both sides are using brute force to push their belief. And that seems to just make the other side angrier and more dug in. How do we have conversations anymore?

    Edit: oof. Yeah, that is where we are.

    • Dionysus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We can’t have conversations because one side argues in bad faith, makes shit up, and behaves like fucking gremlins by defunding services then claiming they don’t work.

      Sure, step away from the topic itself. Blue states don’t have post birth abortions, slavery did not benefit African American, climate change is not a hoax, and Rosa Parks was protesting racism. Claiming otherwise isn’t “alternative facts”, they’re just fucking lies.

      “Both sides” - fucking brainlet.

    • literallydogshit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Group 1: I understand that transgenderism is legitimate and supported by science. People should be able to identify as the gender they feel most comfortable.

      Group 2: I want to FUCKING kill EVERYONE in group one!

      Centrists: Why can’t both sides just see eye to eye already and get along? I am so smart.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The fact that you even think that “both sides” is a valid argument, means that your opinion is literally worthless.

      Because either you are intentionally arguing in bad faith and you know you’re lying, or you actually believe that. Which means you lack the mental capacity to see something objectively.

      EDIT: Based on your edit and other comments it’s obvious that you’re one of those people who think that everyone else secretly agrees with you, and when you face backlash like this comment, you think it’s just a few people being reactionary. Because heaven forbid you looked at something objectively or learned something.

    • itsJoelle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      My parents are gay. Do you think it’s wrong to “brute force” that they do, indeed, exist and are harmless?

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the sky is green, and that homeless dude down on the corner agrees with me. But everyone else just insists that the sky is blue and calls me crazy. Why can’t we agree on facts? I know the sky is green so I’m never going to change my mind, but why can’t we just agree? How do we fix that?

    • Im14abeer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The subject at hand is accreditation of a course in psychology,. Tell me how you on one hand call transgenderism a mental illness and on the other refuse to teach - in an AP course - the subject of gender and sexuality. I’d submit there are a number subjects we can “both sides” about, but what’s happening in Florida ain’t it. There’s nothing to be debated here anyway, College Board (may they step on Lego) says if you don’t teach the AP curriculum, you don’t get the credit.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would you waste a perfectly good Lego?

        I got some thumb tacks I won’t ever use because they’re kinda big and ugly.