• J Lou@mastodon.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ESOPs in the US by default work something like that. The author is definitely not advocating that. He has a similar critique of American ESOPs in this work: https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/102452

    The author advocates 1 worker 1 vote (or equal voice if we are talking more sophisticated voting systems like quadratic voting). He is definitely speaking from a more democratic tradition

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh! Well that’s definitely better than what I thought he was advocating.

      But then… why not call it worker ownership? 🤔

      • J Lou@mastodon.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That is strange to me as well. He normally talks about abolishing the employer-employee relationship in favor of democratic worker membership in the firm. I speculate that it has to do with trying to explain it to a more general audience