• PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    At best you’re ignorant and at worst your intentionally lying because you’d rather people died than you had to actually prove you were a responsible gun owner. Either way, your “gut feelings” about suicide are demonstrably wrong.

    Means reduction is a massive part of suicide prevention, at both a social and personal level. It’s why they take away knives but not spoons, despite a determined enough person being able to kill themselves with basically anything, even gravity.

    And do you know how many people who survive a suicide attempt go on to die by suicide? 1 in 10. Do you know how many people survive suicide attempts with guns? Basically 0.

    Even your “it’s a mental health problem” excuse is bullshit.

    I know the motivation is to demand something impossible is done before you will even consider gun control – in this case, accessible mental healthcare for every man, woman and child in America that can instantly cure them of complex problems far beyond even the most cutting edge medical science, so completely that they will never relapse for even a minute, delivered within a budget of $0.

    But do you know what you’re actually doing? Admitting that the American public are simply not healthy enough for such permissive gun laws to be safe.

    So how about we just take your guns away and when you’ve finished building that impossible mental healthcare network, you can have them back.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      In Colorado we recently voted to help people commit suicide if their circumstances suck enough, and I’m for that.

      I think if you take away a person’s means of suicide you are encasing them in a prison of flesh. A person has the right to decide whether their own life continues and if your plan for suicide prevention is to remove the means, it just means you’re willing to force people to suffer fates worse than death.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah how dare “the government” tell you not to go on a killing spree that targets children or threaten your wife with a gun if she tries to leave.

        You can feign all the melodramatic indignation you want but your peers and politicians have shown over and over again how little they actually believe in the “freedom” you claim to value.

        The majority of the pro-gun crowd staunchly vote Republican, the party that says you can’t smoke pot or can’t pay a consenting adult for sex and they can listen on your phone whenever they want.

        And of course like every government, they also say you can’t build your own home with your own hands, can’t own land mines and hand grenades, can’t drive or fly without a license, can’t run a kitchen from a public toilet and a million other rules that the pro-gun crowd doesn’t object to because they know there are massive public safety risks without those regulations.

        But the moment someone suggests adding semi-automatic guns to that list, the pro-gun beat their chest and pretend they rule themselves as free and independent men who don’t need no society.

        And the moment a Republican in a gun-happy, right-wing state suggests banning gay or interracial marriage (again) or executing women who have abortions, they cheer furiously.

        Not of your freedoms came from the barrel or a gun, nor your own hand, nor the people you support.