• michaelrose@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Resources that would have gone into Ads and Rallies, will now have to be spent fighting these Radical Left Thugs in numerous courts”

    Or you could spend your own money

    “It is Election Interference, & the Supreme Court must intercede,”

    That isn’t how the court works you file in whatever court has jurisdiction then appeal if you have cause. It would be contrary to standards for them to even comment at this juncture.

    If he wanted to campaign unimpeded he could have simply not committed the crimes he has openly admitted to on TV

    • StarServal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wait…

      “Resources that would have gone into Ads and Rallies, will now have to be spent fighting these Radical Left Thugs in numerous courts”

      Did he just admit to another crime?

      • OptimusPrimeDownfall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t think so. You can put your own money into running a political campaign.

        However, the IMPLICATION that he uses campaign donations for his legal defense is there. And stupid MAGA donors will believe that’s how their money could be spent and that it’s OK.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s all super PAC money that has very little rules about its use. They’ve been using it thus way all along and openly raising money for legal defense. He may be admitting to exerting control over the super pac, which is supposed to be against the law, but seems to be practically unenforceable.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s a part of me that believes he only ran again because, aside from his ego, he believed it would make him immune to indictments.

      Unfortunately Mango Mussolini could even be arrested and still win the presidency from prison… (Although it is a good thing the rules exist in that way)

    • Zalack@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      IMO this is mainly a way to communicate taking points to his supporters. They want to start a lot of talk about Biden’s “election Interference” to make it feel like this is something both sides do but only Trump is getting charged for.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      If he wanted to campaign unimpeded he could have simply not committed the crimes he has openly admitted to on TV

      For being the party that supposedly represents “law and order”, Republicans really seem soft on crime (at least on the ones they continually committed).

    • Pissnpink@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Can’t the SCOTUS adopt cases they think have some sort of importance outside of the apeal system? I thought I heard of them just recently doing that on a case they ruled on.

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Typically they don’t but this supreme court has already shown what it thinks of established legal procedure.

      • theodewere@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        adopt cases

        there is no case to adopt… he wants them to create one or something, i don’t know… neither does he…

      • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, basically the attorney general of some states claims that there was a business that was harmed by certain laws, which the business deny that they were harmed, but the supreme Court heard the case anyways and ruled that the business was actually harmed by said law so it was overturned.

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s because Trump was trying to use the Justice Department to forward his own interests, so he assumes that any other president does/did the same thing.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    Trump, the top contender in the Republican presidential primary, claimed that dealing with numerous ongoing legal battles amounts to “election interference” — the very thing he is accused of conspiring to do in his latest indictment.

    He’s doing the DARVO thing again. Since he’s being accused of election interference, he’s using the “NO U” defense, and hoping “his people” at the Supreme Court bail him out.

    It doesn’t work that way. If he wanted to have his time free to campaign, maybe he shouldn’t have done so much crime to begin with.

  • mateomaui@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    So… he did just admit to using election funds for his personal legal battles, which is illegal… right?

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    “It is Election Interference, & the Supreme Court must intercede,” he wrote.

    The first four words seem relevant to him, just not in the way he means.

  • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah right, the supreme Court has no actual jurisdiction over anything. What are they going to do, send in the army to free Trump?

    Lol

  • itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    he must not be getting enough help in Congress outside of the usual loonies so he’s moving on to another branch of government.