Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well one is done precautionary as it doesn’t have any big life altering side effects

    I mean, reduced sensation, higher rates of some kinds of sexual difficulty later in life, and like anything that causes pain and stress to a neonate there are signs that it can have long term psychological effects.

    • Eyck_of_denesle
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      You would only notice it if you get it done after growing up. I don’t understand the logic here. Have you been circumcised?

      • pinchcramp@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Many men lose sensation over the course of their life. Circumcised men seem to be affected by this much more severeley (anecdotal experience).

        I’m in my mid thirties, circumcised at birth, and feel virtually nothing on my glans. Any form of intimacy that involves my dick is more of a chore than anything else. And no, the problem is not that I wank too often or have some unhealthy porn consumption (pretty much non-existent).

        Do you think it’s okay to burn a clitoris if the girl hasn’t had sex before? Can we blind babies because they will never know what they have lost?

        Can we violate anyone’s bodily autonomy as long as they will not remember what life was like before the violation?