None of the charges relate to it because he wasn’t arrested for the sex tape, they found out about it while investigating the theft. Any charges for the sex tape will be done separate. They don’t lump charges for crimes together unless the second crime was committed along with the first.
You know they can do both, right? They don’t have to limit themselves to one article per story. They can write this one and one about the other charges.
And hats off to you for taking a hard stance on a lie, and then instead of apologising when you are called out, insulting the person that called out your bullshit. I’m not “defending” Newsweek. I’m calling you a liar.
If a person has a pending charge and pick up a new one unrelated to the first, unless there is some procedural or legal conflict, the two cases can be (and often are) combined for judicial expediency as it will be the same judge and prosecutor (and public defender if that applies) on both cases. Also, sometimes one jury can hear both charges, and sometimes they need to be tried separately, and that can depend on a variety of factors.
“But at the same time this kid is 18. He’s young and stupid, who cares? Stupid kid does stupid things and is dumb enough to get caught.”
Perhaps though if it was you or me (at that age) or any teenager off the street, it’s not national “news.” Many people grow up to regret youthful indiscretions, and fortunately most of those acts didn’t become national headlines that follow one forever. (I’m just not a fan of every act in this digital age being preserved on the internet in perpetuity. A prime example are those parasitic websites that scrape arrest records to then extort those who have been arrested (whether or not eventually found innocent at trial or charges dismissed)).
Clickbait headline. The 22 charges should be the focus.
But at the same time this kid is 18. He’s young and stupid, who cares? Stupid kid does stupid things and is dumb enough to get caught.
None of the charges relate to it because he wasn’t arrested for the sex tape, they found out about it while investigating the theft. Any charges for the sex tape will be done separate. They don’t lump charges for crimes together unless the second crime was committed along with the first.
I’m of the mind that if the girl was in his age group it shouldn’t even matter. But we don’t know so whatever.
I’m just saying that they should be talking about the 22 charges for thieft and etc, not a what if video.
You know they can do both, right? They don’t have to limit themselves to one article per story. They can write this one and one about the other charges.
Right right. But they didn’t do that, so here we are.
Yeah, they fucking did. https://www.newsweek.com/lauren-boebert-son-arrest-record-tyler-1874247
Lol I gotta hand it to you for your commitment to “fucking” defending Newsweek.
And hats off to you for taking a hard stance on a lie, and then instead of apologising when you are called out, insulting the person that called out your bullshit. I’m not “defending” Newsweek. I’m calling you a liar.
Lmao whatever gets you by
Sorry about your ego brah
?
If a person has a pending charge and pick up a new one unrelated to the first, unless there is some procedural or legal conflict, the two cases can be (and often are) combined for judicial expediency as it will be the same judge and prosecutor (and public defender if that applies) on both cases. Also, sometimes one jury can hear both charges, and sometimes they need to be tried separately, and that can depend on a variety of factors.
“But at the same time this kid is 18. He’s young and stupid, who cares? Stupid kid does stupid things and is dumb enough to get caught.”
Perhaps though if it was you or me (at that age) or any teenager off the street, it’s not national “news.” Many people grow up to regret youthful indiscretions, and fortunately most of those acts didn’t become national headlines that follow one forever. (I’m just not a fan of every act in this digital age being preserved on the internet in perpetuity. A prime example are those parasitic websites that scrape arrest records to then extort those who have been arrested (whether or not eventually found innocent at trial or charges dismissed)).