• subunit317@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    11 months ago

    Houstonian of 30+ years here.

    Even with the insane number of lanes available, driving anywhere inside beltway 8 between like 12 pm and 8pm is hell on earth. And outside those hours, you’re playing chicken with drunk drivers.

    Before I started working remote, I used to clock my average speed to and from work. Most of the time it was 15-20mph on a 65mph freeway. Literally bicycle speeds. Without cars or gridlocked traffic, I could have commuted faster on a bike.

    More than one person dies in Houston traffic every day on average. This is probably the shittiest and most expensive form of mass transit mankind will ever build. At least I hope this is as bad as it ever gets, lol.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It’s absolutely insane how many people die every single day because we thought it was a good idea to let everyone operate multi-ton pieces of heavy machinery at hundreds of km per hour on the reg.

      How the fuck is there more regular testing and training for people driving forklifts than Dodge Rams?

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Last time I was in Houston I was driving in bumper-to-bumper traffic that was going 95 mph. I looked over to my right and saw a group of five cars pass me going at least 10 to 20 mph faster. This would not have been remarkable except that I was in the right lane and these cars were passing me on the shoulder.

      This being Houston, though, that’s still probably not remarkable.

      • subunit317@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Can confirm, this happens a lot too. That level of recklessness should be remarkable, but that’s just how people roll around here. There’s a special sort of Houston PTSD that comes from almost dying in a car on the way to work every single day.

        • subunit317@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Unfortunately I don’t think that is a typo, lol. Death race is definitely how I would describe the I-45 Houston experience. If I’m not mistaken, the section of it that runs through Houston is actually one of the most dangerous stretches of road in the entire US. People absolutely tailgate at 90+ on that road.

    • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I live in a medium-sized city and I learned years ago that if you want to get anywhere on time, stay off the freeway. It’s not nearly as wide, but it has on ramps at shit intervals and the on ramps mostly give you no room to accelerate to highway speeds, so it’s always congested. I’m actually about to go a couple towns south as I write this and looking at GPS the freeway route which is the most direct will take 20 minutes longer than simply going through back country roads that add an addition 10 miles to the trip.

    • EatMyDick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      Going 20 mph for any distance on a bike includes and assumption of good health, includes carrying a change of clothes, and shower which most workplace don’t offer.

  • cron@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    After widening was completed in 2008, a portion of the highway west of Houston is now also believed to be the widest in the world, at 26 lanes when including feeders. - (Wikipedia)

    WTF

    • luciole@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Looks a bit jammed on the photo though. I’m sure one more lane will fix that. /s

    • Thisisforfun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That sounds like extremely bad planning. In essence they could have had several smaller highways that better suited the needs of the users without forcing them all onto this clusterfuck.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There’s already another highway 4 miles north and 4 miles south of it. There’s some 2-lane each way roads between, but anything bigger or more grade-separated would be further isolate communities, take away alternative transportation routes, and take away greenspace.

    • thatwill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      And despite the extra lanes, it’s still gridlocked. Maybe they need just one more lane…

        • darvocet@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I e moved out of Houston but if i recall correctly they also removed the rail line that was adjacent to this highway for the expansion.

          There was a killer hamburger place off like Gessner that i still miss.

          • cron@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            An old railway running along the north side of the freeway was demolished in 2002 in preparation for construction which began in 2004.

            Form the wiki article linked above

          • notacat@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Is Houston aware that some cities pay hundreds of millions of dollars to install a rail line to address this exact problem?

  • Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 months ago

    This will soon become top 100 most popular photos. Its synonymous with car dependency and post WWII American urban planning

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Government offloaded transportation onto individuals and parking onto business, now everyone is worse off.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    How common/usable is subway in bigger cities? Here in Prague we have an amazing public transport, even with priority lanes for buses at some places and most importantly a pretty decent subway. I’ve never had an issue getting anywhere around the city in a short time (I can get anywhere in the city within 1.5 hour max (that is including suburbs around Prague), around 30 mins to places around the center), and the cost of an unlimited year-long ticket is just 150EUR.

    • GTG3000@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      Русский
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      Oil and automotive companies literally tore most of public transport out in US way back when.
      They would invest into the local tram companies, buy them out, then close and tear out the lines.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      In the US, public transportation is pretty much unusable in bigger cities except for NYC.

      America has this weird, masochistic relationship with cars that just gridlocks everyone. But “FreEdoM.”

      • NotNotMike@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        One potential reason posited by The 1619 Project is due to white Americans moving out of metro areas after WW2 in order to “escape” black residents. Then, they restricted expansion of public transportation development to those areas because making them more accessible and usable would potentially result in a influx of poorer, black residents who can’t afford a car to commute to the suburbs.

        The specific example they used is Atlanta, which has staunch racial lines, horrible public transport, and some of the worst traffic in America. They make a very compelling case.

        Here is the relevant New York Times article about it and it’s Chapter 16 in the actual book

          • NotNotMike@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think definitely in downtown areas with a large night culture, but to a much lesser extent. The entire city center isn’t expensive, just the “hip” areas where the money is being spent. There are tons of poorer areas inside city limits that definitely have a lower cost of living compared to owning a house and a car

        • FuzzyDoublePumper@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Chicago is pretty expensive for public transportation. A monthly pass is $75 for the L and buses. A commute from the northern suburbs is $100 a month for Metra trains and an additional $30 per month for buses and the L. There are discounts for people that qualify.

          The price and the poor schedule to northern suburbs makes it unusable for me. It’s great for weekend trips to the city.

          • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            $130 is still a cost saving compared to gas, depreciation, and renting a parking space in town though, isn’t it?

            • FuzzyDoublePumper@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              For many people that’s true, especially if you don’t need the Metra pass. I’d consider it if the stops to my station were scheduled more often. The bar car is gone from the Metra, but they still allow alcohol so you can relax, have a drink, and listen to music.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s my freedom to sit stuck on hot asphalt for hours at a time. Gridlock is real American freedom.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s insanely bad. Hell, Canada has shown that public transit is viable with the North American development model, but the US simply refuses to invest money into public works.

      Vancouver SkyTrain and Montreal REM/Metro are both fast, highly efficient subway systems that are able to navigate single-family housing development. Why can’t the US?

      • nik282000@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Come to Toronto/The GTA, the lack of investment in public transit is on par with the rest of North America.

        • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          When I was in Toronto, the transit wasn’t great but it was at least better than Boston/Philadelphia…

    • 80085@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not many U.S. cities have a subway. I think the only substantial subway system is in NYC. The city I live in has a very short commuter rail line that doesn’t go to/from anywhere people want to go. Buses are gridlocked in traffic like everyone else, and have to make frequent stops, so it can take something like 2 hours to travel 10 miles. The low-wage workers I know without vehicles just spend $40/day on Uber to commute to work and back (which is a significant percentage of their pay).

      • Pipoca@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        NYC is by far the best, but several other cities have fairly decent subways. Boston, DC, Chicago, and San Francisco have decent systems, although Chicago’s is an elevated train and Boston’s has had increasingly severe issues due to underfunding maintainence for decades.

    • alvanrahimli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      unfortunately it is not the case for most of countries. For example, here, in Azerbaijan, rural public transport basically doesn’t exist, and in capital city - Baku - schedules, traffic, prices… They all suck. We only got underground metro, but as that is only sane transport, everyone uses it and on critic hours it also suck. Sadly.

      • MBM@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s to the opposite side of the city, every day travel would probably be closer to that 30 mins

  • Ironfist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 months ago

    But you dont get it, managers need you at the office so they can feel important. You just need to lose 3 hours of your day, spend more money and pollute more, STOP BEING SELFISH!

  • Muad'Dibber@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 months ago

    This reminds me of Andre Gorz - the social ideology of the motor car . Essentially:

    The invention of the personal automobile, and destruction of public transportation, was a triumph of capitalist drug-peddling; suddenly, all at once, everyone’s personal mobility became dependent on a single, new commodity, gasoline. Without it, we are unable to function, since urban sprawl and suburbanization now means we can’t even walk to work if we wanted to.

    And going by time, by spreading everything out, it ended up taking the same amount of time to get to work, in 1900 as in 1980.

  • Gnubyte@lemdit.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    That gave me a good chuckle.

    It’s odd how we’ve commoditized such selfishly resource hungry transportation. I like walking to stuff as long as where I live is safe.

  • m3m3lord@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is true. Commuting in an urban or suburban environment should be significantly easier than it currently is. Public infrastructure needs to improve and become less car-centric. That being said, if you live in a rural area or a small town where there is very little traffic, or if you need to pick up groceries for your family of 4+, cars are needed. People in anti-car communities do not like to hear this, but I do not think cars should be criticized for merely existing. Current infrastructure should be criticized for only considering them. I think that while holding on to the idea that car=bad is fun, it also sours people who genuinely rely on cars to the movement and limits what actual progress could be made by these communities to make walkable cities a reality. Thank you for listening to my ted talk.

    • Jefflix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s extremely hard to nuance any conversation on any forum when multiple people interact. People almost always assume you’re pro or anti something. It’s also easier mentally to reject what doesn’t match your views.

      Debating on the internet is useless most times to convince the other party, but I’m sure some people reading it who haven’t made up their mind on the subject can appreciate a well put out idea and maybe consider it before making up their mind.

      • Screwthehole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        My truck is used for hauling junk, supplies, tools, moving appliances etc. My job doesn’t work without a truck. Can’t get abandoned furniture to the dump on a bus. It is what it is.

    • Omodi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This seems like a straw-man criticism. I have never seen the anti-car communities attack people in rural areas for needing cars.

    • sLLiK@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Changing to a different form of transportation, unless it involves teleportation, is just moving the problem somewhere else. It might be all electric, and it might get you there twice as fast, but you’re still just leveraging a tactic that moves the goalpost and delays the inevitable.

      Ultimately, there is no right answer to this. The greater the population, the greater the problem. If everyone who could work remotely started doing so, and the rest were afforded decentralized centers for the onsite labor they must do, this would be a more manageable problem. But eventually, we’d be back where we started - it’d just be a higher concentration of onsite workers generating all the traffic, and they might have less distance to travel.

      Coruscant’s traffic problems, or maybe 5th Element’s, are what we’re destined for.

      • m3m3lord@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Better solutions move the problem elsewhere? I’m moving the goalpost and delaying the inevitable? I have no idea what you are talking about.

  • egeres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Brooooooo just one more lane, just one more lane bro, I promise, just one more lane, please, pls pls, one more lane 🥺

  • cobra89@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    The answer is because local governments prioritized cars over streetcars and public transportation:

    The real problem was that once cars appeared on the road, they could drive on streetcar tracks — and the streetcars could no longer operate efficiently. “Once just 10 percent or so of people were driving, the tracks were so crowded that [the streetcars] weren’t making their schedules,” Norton says.

    • momentary@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      We used to have public street cars where I live that took people up and down the hill, but they sold out to a car company. I believe it lasted 2 years before the car company shut it down all together. Wild stuff!

  • imgprojts@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ok I’m here! Where do I put the recliners and all that shit you asked for? Just leave it outside in the sun while I work? Then take it back home, leave it outside the house and do it all over again tomorrow?