• psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I just don’t trust people (like the person above) who […] casually go “I think they’re a pedophile”

    Oof, dude you make me feel bad for giving you a good faithed response after your first comment.

    For someone who urges to be careful with accusations you are pretty grossly misrepresenting my comment here

    non-ironically throw around terms like “radlib”

    I don’t throw it around like Vaush throws around “red-fascist”, “tankie”, “antisemite” and every other slur , I use it specifically for someone who draws upon radical aesthetic in the abstract but supports the capitalist, imperialist status-quo in the specific.

    You can chose to be offended by that, but Vaush is the definition of a radlib

    Honestly I have only ever used it for him. Thinking of it I might use “Vaushite” in the future which has the added benefit of visually representing the fact that his disingenious output is nothing but a thin layer around “shit”

      • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I understand getting tripped up when others chime in with varying intentions. Also my initial comment should have been clearer and did leave more room to read a pedophilia accusation into it than I intended.

        I can see that you argue in good faith and I apologize for some reddit impulses that I haven’t unlearned yet.

        Personally I don’t see the equation of leftism with defending CP in OPs post though.

        The way I read it OP groups “meat-eaters” into categories with each being a drastic exaggeration (the “lvl 5 bloodmouth” is a straight up cannibal) so I think none of this can be taken seriously.

        One “group” is the The “Leftist” meat eater. I expand the quotes to something like The pseudo-leftist meat eater who is then represented by Vaush. To me this is basically a 1 person group that might as well just be called “Vaush” but calling him The pseudo Leftist is just one more swing at him.

        I am definitely both a leftist and not a vegan (someday maybe) and I don’t mind the post in fact I found it quite funny (but obviously very few ppl agree). I agree though that slapping the CP stuff under Vaushs pic is unfair to him, as some people will take it seriously, I have to say that humor was also not lost on me though

        • hoodatninja@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I can see that you argue in good faith and I apologize for some reddit impulses that I haven’t unlearned yet.

          You and me both man. Someone the other day said “that classic reddit performative snark” and fuck me if it didn’t feel like I heard a gunshot. Looking through this thread I came pretty close to going full tilt that direction again. Still learning I suppose.

          Personally I don’t see the equation of leftism with defending CP in OPs post though.

          So I’m a little surprised to see this. The image explicitly says:

          THE “LEFTIST”
          No ethical consumption under capitalism. Legalize child porn NOW!" (bolding my own)

          So the post to me is saying “leftists want to legalize child porn.” With Vaush as a poster for all leftists. I do not see it as purely about Vaush anymore than i see the “Plants Rights Activist” commentary being about solely Joe Rogan (which funny enough is not even a stance I think he holds, but I dislike him and don’t care to confirm lol).

          Let me give another example: If I was making a meme and put “Conservatives [insert picture of George Bush above it]: Wants their steak bloody. Hates gay people.” Would you say “ah this is just about George Bush” or would you see it as I see it, which is a statement about ALL conservatives with simply an image of one?

          The images are just meant to accent the content, not be taken directly as the subject. Does that make sense?