Anyone else have a similar experience with one of these drives?

  • Offlein@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    307
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    What the fuck are all these comments?

    It’s an article about an unresolved and recurring problem with a popular drive that the ostensibly reputable manufacturer is trying to hide.

    But 90% of the comments are people jerking themselves off about how smart they are for using RAID, which is irrelevant to the point of the article… But never miss an opportunity to pleasure yourself in public I guess?

    • saddlebag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy definitely showing the same symptoms as Reddit as it grows. Too many people trying to show off how technically smart they are and just come off as obnoxious dweebs

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol this place is half a circle jerk of people who think they’re certified geniuses for rejecting mainstream technology, tech hipsters. There was a thread about Google’s “safe browsing” thing and most of the comments were just "iMaGiNe UsInG gOoGle!!*

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      My only counter argument is that the verge article should also have stuck to the failures/defect, and either not mentioned their own dataloss, or at least mention possible mitigation strategies. I understand not everyone can do proper backups, but the verge can, and they should lead by example.

      As for a comment on the actual drive defect, this is probably one of those cases where you want to insist on a refund. If the problem is as widespread as claimed, then getting a new defective drive doesn’t really help. WD/sandisk should just be recalling and refunding all devices. It’s odd that tech stuff never seems to have recalls in the same way that cars do? They seem to just rely on individual RMAs.

      • XTornado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t usually recalls mostly for cases where it would cause personal injuries and as such the damages to the company are far bigger than not doing the recall.

        • CameronDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it’s probably a risk/damages calculation. But imagine if WD had simply recalled all affected devices. Might mitigate some of the PR damage?

    • rambos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is your comment with so many upvotes but I still had to scroll down to find it. Everything above is kinda morbid. Im glad I scrolled enough, was worried a bit 🤣

    • hypelightfly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Did you read the article? Because as far as I can see it fails to actually say shit about the problem. From just this article I can see why people are blaming the author for not having redundancy.

      The Arstechnica articles however do actually say what’s going on, so yeah this appears to be a real issue with these drives disconnecting.

    • Selmafudd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      But never miss an opportunity to pleasure yourself in public I guess?

      I mean I wasn’t really in the mood but I’ll rub one out just for you

    • Maximilious@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then the article title should be less click bait termed and properly address that there’s a major firmware fault in the drives.

      Journalism is lost on generating clicks and user turmoil rather than servicing the public in any way.