“There’s this wild disconnect between what people are experiencing and what economists are experiencing,” says Nikki Cimino, a recruiter in Denver.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you don’t save and invest it, you’ll be living paycheck to paycheck for the rest of your life.

    I don’t think you really know what “living paycheck to paycheck” actually means if you think it, in any way, involves investing.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think his point is people are only living paycheck to paycheck out of choice when they could save and invest if they tightened their belts.

      Not saying I agree, just explaining his perspective.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        There are peple who are genuinly struggling.

        Then there are those who choose to spend 10-20K on vacations every year and ‘feel’ they are struggling.

        And these latter people will forever tell you how they are living ‘paycheck to paycheck’ and talk your ear off about how theri struggles are more genuine and ‘real’ than people who are actually poor.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          In some cases genuinely yes. If you are earning $X and you are spending $X every month, but some of those expenditures are on luxury items like fine foods, then complaining about how you’re living paycheck-to-paycheck and don’t have the “choice” to invest rings hollow. You do have the choice to invest, you’re just choosing to spend that investable money on immediate luxuries instead.

          • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            SOME cases? Half the country isn’t really earning enough to more than barely get by. They have nothing to invest. They aren’t spending much on “fine” foods unless you are counting not eating entirely ramen and rice as “fine foods”

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      You can have very high income and still live paycheck to paycheck if you spend every paycheck

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        living paycheck to paycheck” generally means that all money is spent on living expenses and there is very little, if anything, left over. If you have any appreciable discretionary income, you are not living paycheck to paycheck.

          • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I’m not concerned about what those people say; they are doing just fine. I’m concerned about the people who are actually living paycheck to paycheck.